Re: Are these bash.v.posix diffs still useful? They _seem_ dated...

2021-01-31 Thread L A Walsh
On 2021/01/31 10:54, Chet Ramey wrote: On 1/30/21 6:50 PM, L A Walsh wrote: First behavior: How is it beneficial for bash to store a non-executable in the command-hash? Probably not very, but it's not all that harmful. The `checkhash' option overrides this. --- Does checkhash

Re: Are these bash.v.posix diffs still useful? They _seem_ dated...

2021-01-31 Thread Chet Ramey
On 1/30/21 6:50 PM, L A Walsh wrote: Since this "https://tiswww.case.edu/php/chet/bash/POSIX; doesn't seem to be version specific, I'm assuming these are in the latest bash version. I don't understand the benefit of the differences involving hashed-commands and recovery behavior. It seemed like

Are these bash.v.posix diffs still useful? They _seem_ dated...

2021-01-30 Thread L A Walsh
Since this "https://tiswww.case.edu/php/chet/bash/POSIX; doesn't seem to be version specific, I'm assuming these are in the latest bash version. I don't understand the benefit of the differences involving hashed-commands and recovery behavior. It seemed like these behaviors may have served a