On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 2:20 AM Chet Ramey wrote:
>
> On 8/19/18 10:27 AM, konsolebox wrote:
>
> >> This proposal simply requests an intuitively equivalent simple
> >> assignment syntax for associative arrays just like a='...' and
> >> a=(...), with same behavior for scoping.
> >>
> >> Maybe we ca
On 8/19/18 10:27 AM, konsolebox wrote:
>> This proposal simply requests an intuitively equivalent simple
>> assignment syntax for associative arrays just like a='...' and
>> a=(...), with same behavior for scoping.
>>
>> Maybe we can add another option like -G to have similar effect but
>> that's
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 12:53 AM, konsolebox wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 10:31 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
>> On 7/27/18 7:13 PM, konsolebox wrote:
>>> Hi Chet,
>>>
>>> I wonder if you can allow bash to have another syntax to allow simpler
>>> declaration and/or definition of associative arrays. T
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 10:31 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 7/27/18 7:13 PM, konsolebox wrote:
>> Hi Chet,
>>
>> I wonder if you can allow bash to have another syntax to allow simpler
>> declaration and/or definition of associative arrays. The changes
>> needed to have it done seem simple enough, an
On 7/27/18 7:13 PM, konsolebox wrote:
> Hi Chet,
>
> I wonder if you can allow bash to have another syntax to allow simpler
> declaration and/or definition of associative arrays. The changes
> needed to have it done seem simple enough, and the only conflict it
> makes is a scalar `var={...` assig
Hi Chet,
I wonder if you can allow bash to have another syntax to allow simpler
declaration and/or definition of associative arrays. The changes
needed to have it done seem simple enough, and the only conflict it
makes is a scalar `var={...` assignment, which in my opinion is better
quoted to mak
