That's what I indeed observed; since 'BASH_BUILTINS(1)' is documented here
written in the conventional syntax; then at least it tends to indicate that its
respective command 'man 1 bash_builtins' can be executed in Bash. Maybe
then there is an hidden reason for which it should be considered
On 07/14/2018 09:38 PM, Ricky Tigg wrote:
> $ man 1 bash_builtins
The variable is BASH_BUILTINS but the man page is bash-builtins
(underscore vs. dash).
Peter
On 7/14/18 10:38 AM, Ricky Tigg wrote:
> OS: Fedora; Component: bash.x86_64 4.4.23-1.fc28 @updates
>
> Description: Non-valid documented command 'BASH_BUILTINS(1)'.
This is an issue to take up with Fedora. But doesn't this show that the
`command' isn't `documented':
> $ man 1 bash_builtins
> No
OS: Fedora; Component: bash.x86_64 4.4.23-1.fc28 @updates
Description: Non-valid documented command 'BASH_BUILTINS(1)'.
$ man 1 bash_builtins
No manual entry for bash_builtins in section 1
$ man bash_builtins
No manual entry for bash_builtins
Additional informations:
$ apropos bash
(...)
alias
