On 26 March 2016 at 01:28, Val Krem wrote:
>
> is it possible to combine the two scripts in one so that I can define the
> varietals at one spot. It would be less prone to error.
Yes - you can have a script with a "case" and hard link to another
name (you can symlink but
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 01:28:56AM +, Val Krem wrote:
> Both scrips do have common variables (var1 , var2 and var3) and also some
> input and output folder name defined.
>
> At the present I have defined the variables and folders path in both scripts.
>
> Instead of this, is it possible
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Val Krem wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what you want, but you could always pipe one script into
> another and evaluate the input from the later. Or just call the second
> script from the first in an if.
>
(untested)
#!/bin/bash # t2.sh
read f
if [[
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Val Krem wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what you want, but you could always pipe one script into
> another and evaluate the input from the later. Or just call the second
> script from the first in an if.
>
>
> It is not the question of PIPE one script
On Mar 25, 2016 9:32 PM, "Val Krem" wrote:
>
> At the present I have defined the variables and folders path in both
scripts.
>
> Instead of this, is it possible to combine the two scripts in one so
that I can define the varietals at one spot. It would be less prone to
error.