Clark Wang wrote:
I had the same problem months ago. See Chet's answer:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2014-03/msg00069.html
===
Yep though I'm not sure about the reasoning in providing
different behaviors based on default-dir-expansion == convert
all relative paths to
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:54 AM, Linda Walsh b...@tlinx.org wrote:
From the manpage I wouldn't have guess it changed
paths to absolute -- but would expand variables and wildcards
in the path.
It doesn't seem to make alot of sense when there are other
ways to go from rel-abs, but not so many
From the manpage I wouldn't have guess it changed
paths to absolute -- but would expand variables and wildcards
in the path.
It doesn't seem to make alot of sense when there are other
ways to go from rel-abs, but not so many that just expand
vars or aliases on a dir.
Does anyone know why
