Re: bash autocompletion bug report (unable to send via bashbug)

2007-03-23 Thread Chet Ramey
Shriramana Sharma wrote: Hello. Here's the bug report that bashbug was unable to send because it did not find something called rmail on my system. I hope these bugs can be fixed. Thanks for the report. The bash completion system is developed and distributed separately from bash. It uses

The ASCII character \001 (^A) breaks the escape sequence interpretation.

2007-03-23 Thread BAGSHAW Paul RD-TECH-REN
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]: Machine: i686 OS: linux-gnu Compiler: gcc Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='i686' -DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='i686-pc-linux-gnu' -DCONF_VENDOR='pc' -DLOCALEDIR='/usr/local/share/locale'

Re: source(builtin) and read(2)

2007-03-23 Thread Andreas Schwab
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: builtins/evalfile.c _evalfile() { fd = open (filename, O_RDONLY); fstat (fd, finfo); file_size = (size_t)finfo.st_size; string = (char *)xmalloc (1 + file_size); result = read (fd, string, file_size); string[result] = '\0'; ;;; } (I checked

Re: source(builtin) and read(2)

2007-03-23 Thread Andreas Schwab
Matthew Woehlke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Um. In fact, it is also an *ERROR* (i.e. read() will fail outright with - IIRC - EINVAL) to try to read more than SSIZE_MAX bytes at once. Many, but not all, systems define SSIZE_MAX to be a very large value, but it may be as small as 32k. I guess

Re: source(builtin) and read(2)

2007-03-23 Thread Matthew Woehlke
Andreas Schwab wrote: Matthew Woehlke writes: Um. In fact, it is also an *ERROR* (i.e. read() will fail outright with - IIRC - EINVAL) to try to read more than SSIZE_MAX bytes at once. Many, but not all, systems define SSIZE_MAX to be a very large value, but it may be as small as 32k. I guess

Re: source(builtin) and read(2)

2007-03-23 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Matthew Woehlke on 3/23/2007 1:38 PM: Huh? I never said anything about ssize_t, I said SSIZE_MAX which appears to be guaranteed by POSIX to be at least 32 *kilobytes*, SSIZE_MAX is guaranteed to be the maximum value that fits in

Re: source(builtin) and read(2)

2007-03-23 Thread Matthew Woehlke
Eric Blake wrote: According to Matthew Woehlke on 3/23/2007 1:38 PM: Huh? I never said anything about ssize_t, I said SSIZE_MAX which appears to be guaranteed by POSIX to be at least 32 *kilobytes*, SSIZE_MAX is guaranteed to be the maximum value that fits in ssize_t. Again, if your ssize_t

Re: source(builtin) and read(2)

2007-03-23 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Matthew Woehlke on 3/23/2007 2:40 PM: SSIZE_MAX is guaranteed to be the maximum value that fits in ssize_t. Again, if your ssize_t is smaller than 32 bits, your platform has other issues. Just because POSIX allows ssize_t to be as

Re: source(builtin) and read(2)

2007-03-23 Thread Andreas Schwab
Matthew Woehlke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hmm... well then I guess this is broken: /usr/include/limits.h:#define SSIZE_MAX53248/* max single I/O size, 52K */ The creativity of system designers always amazes me. :-( Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]