Re: Bash-4.0-rc1 available for FTP

2009-02-02 Thread Dan Nicolaescu
Nicolas niko...@gmail.com writes: Hello, I ran some benchmarks of Bash 4.0-rc1. It is quite impressive! Here are the results. My computer is a Pentium M (running at 600 MHz for the test), running Linux 2.6.26 with libc6 version 2.7 and Debian bash-completion version 20080705.

Re: bash 3.2 and bash 4.0 (RC1) fail to build statically

2009-02-02 Thread Alex Howells
2009/2/2 Chet Ramey chet.ra...@case.edu: I was able to successfully compile and link after configuring --enable-static-link --without-bash-malloc (there's some problem with libc and the bash malloc when you try a static link). Yep that works for me too on anything except Debian GNU/Linux. On

Build Problem

2009-02-02 Thread Rupinder Singh
Hello, I'm trying to build Bash 3.1 on Wndows XP system using MSYS. I'm getting a build failure at make as follows: *** *** * * * GNU bash, version

Re: bash, no slash

2009-02-02 Thread davide . chiarini
Hi Chet I'm almost positive that you've remapped / to another character (or a command that has no discernible effect) in readline.  Look at your readline startup files.  You can see your current key bindings with `bind -p' from the bash prompt. thanks, I was finally able to find the problem.

Re: bash 3.2 and bash 4.0 (RC1) fail to build statically

2009-02-02 Thread Chet Ramey
Alex Howells wrote: 2009/2/2 Chet Ramey chet.ra...@case.edu: I was able to successfully compile and link after configuring --enable-static-link --without-bash-malloc (there's some problem with libc and the bash malloc when you try a static link). Yep that works for me too on anything except