Re: bash 4.2 breaks source finding libs in lib/filename...

2012-03-01 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 03/02/2012 02:50 AM, Chet Ramey wrote: > On 2/29/12 2:42 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > > In the middle of the histrionics and gibberish, we have the nugget of an > actual proposal (thanks, Eric): > > [to allow `.' to look anchored relative pathnames up in $PATH] > >> About the best we can do

Re: RFE: allow bash to have libraries

2012-03-01 Thread John Kearney
https://github.com/dethrophes/Experimental-Bash-Module-System/blob/master/bash/template.sh So can't repeat this enough !play code!!. However suggestions are welcome. If this sort of thing is of interesting I could maintain it online I guess. basically I wan kinda thinking perl/python modul

Re: RFE: allow bash to have libraries

2012-03-01 Thread Clark J. Wang
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 08:20, John Kearney wrote: > :) :)) > Personal best wrote about 1 lines of code which finally became > about 200ish to implement a readkey function. > > Actually ended up with 2 solutions 1 basted on a full bash script > vt100 parser weighing in a about 500 lines inclu

Re: bash 4.2 breaks source finding libs in lib/filename...

2012-03-01 Thread Chet Ramey
On 2/29/12 2:42 PM, Eric Blake wrote: In the middle of the histrionics and gibberish, we have the nugget of an actual proposal (thanks, Eric): [to allow `.' to look anchored relative pathnames up in $PATH] > About the best we can do is accept a patch (are you willing to write it? > if no

Re: RFE: allow bash to have libraries

2012-03-01 Thread John Kearney
:) :)) Personal best wrote about 1 lines of code which finally became about 200ish to implement a readkey function. Actually ended up with 2 solutions 1 basted on a full bash script vt100 parser weighing in a about 500 lines including state tables and a s00 line hack. Check out http://mywiki

Re: RFE: allow bash to have libraries

2012-03-01 Thread Linda Walsh
John Kearney wrote: ... [large repetitive included text elided...] why not just do something like this? <26 line suggested 'header' elided...> gives you more control anyway, pretty quick and simple. At least 30% of the point of this is to take large amounts of common initializatio