Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: x86_64
OS: linux-gnu
Compiler: gcc
Compilation CFLAGS: -g -O2
uname output: Linux mosaic 5.18.17-200.fc36.x86_64 #1 SMP
PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Aug 11 14:36:06 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64
GNU/Linux
Machine Type:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022, 3:12 PM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 12:38:44PM -0700, Koichi Murase wrote:
> > As far as I know, glob/extglob
> > does not have constructs that cannot be represented by formal regular
> > languages so should always be able to be represented by NFAs and
2022年10月11日(火) 13:12 Greg Wooledge :
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 12:38:44PM -0700, Koichi Murase wrote:
> > As far as I know, glob/extglob
> > does not have constructs that cannot be represented by formal regular
> > languages so should always be able to be represented by NFAs and thus DFAs.
>
>
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 12:38:44PM -0700, Koichi Murase wrote:
> As far as I know, glob/extglob
> does not have constructs that cannot be represented by formal regular
> languages so should always be able to be represented by NFAs and thus DFAs.
It's been too many decades since I studied this
2022年10月11日(火) 16:22 Martin D Kealey :
> However I note that it's not always possible to make a Deterministic FSA
> when you have repeatable groups which themselves don't have fixed lengths
> (like a+(a|abbba|aabb*aba)b);
This is not true. Any non-deterministic finite automaton (NFA) can be
On 10/11/22 1:26 AM, Phi Debian wrote:
On the contrary I see nor reference saying the 'pattern matching for
pathname expansion can also be used by extension to any strings, but now I
understand it is.
The conditional command is explicit about it:
"When the == and != operators are used,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 9:02 AM Martin D Kealey
wrote:
> Broadly I meant translating into a "preferably" Deterministic
> (stackless/non-backtracking) Finite State Automaton.
>
> However I note that it's not always possible to make a Deterministic FSA
> when you have repeatable groups which
Broadly I meant translating into a "preferably" Deterministic
(stackless/non-backtracking) Finite State Automaton.
However I note that it's not always possible to make a Deterministic FSA
when you have repeatable groups which themselves don't have fixed lengths
(like a+(a|abbba|aabb*aba)b);
You do realize that there are no "nested functions" in bash, right?
Graycat, talk to me on Libera if you really doubt my understanding.
All functions exist in a single, global function namespace.
>
> unicorn:~$ bash
> unicorn:~$ f() { g() { echo I am g; }; }
> unicorn:~$ f
> unicorn:~$ type g
>
iner ==> infer sorry about typo's
Hum, may be I was over optimistic regarding alloca(), it seems it core
dumps as well :-), i.e never return NULL.
I was mentioning alloca() because I use to do my own stacksize check using
getrlimit() and getting the max stack size, and measuring the distance
between the stack_base and the
11 matches
Mail list logo