On Mär 30 2023, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 10:10 AM Oğuz İsmail Uysal
> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/30/23 2:12 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> > IFS=,
>> > str='foo,bar,,roo,'
>> > printf '"%s"\n' $str
>> zsh is the only shell that generates an empty last field, no
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023, at 2:25 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 11:48 AM Oğuz İsmail Uysal
> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/30/23 7:51 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> > So? This is argumentum ad populum. The fact that most shells do X
>> > doesn't imply that POSIX says X.
>
>> POSIX
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 11:52:06 -0600
Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Chet wrote:
> > Alternately, you can think of the NUL at the end of the string as an
> > additional field terminator,
>
> Except if you do that, then 'a,' has two fields since the end of the
> string is an additional field terminator,
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 11:48 AM Oğuz İsmail Uysal
wrote:
>
> On 3/30/23 7:51 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > So? This is argumentum ad populum. The fact that most shells do X
> > doesn't imply that POSIX says X.
> POSIX documents existing practice.
Your definition of what a standard is and
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 11:52:06AM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Not to mention the small detail that the Internal Field Separator is
> not a *separator*, but a terminator (with certain exceptions).
POSIX itself admits that the name is confusing. From sh(1posix):
RATIONALE
[...]
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 11:22 AM Kerin Millar wrote:
>
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 07:51:59 -0600
> Felipe Contreras wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 5:23 AM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 05:12:46AM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > > > IFS=,
> > > >
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 11:35:08AM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > How can you say that the current implementation that bash, dash, etc.
> > use is not compliant to the POSIX specification?
>
> I have never said that.
The title of this thread is "IFS field splitting doesn't conform with
On 3/30/23 7:51 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
So? This is argumentum ad populum. The fact that most shells do X
doesn't imply that POSIX says X.
POSIX documents existing practice. If what it says differs from what the
majority of shells do, then it's POSIX that is wrong. And this mailing
list
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 9:52 AM Emanuele Torre wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 07:51:59AM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > But you can't replicate 'a,b' that way, because b does not have a
> > terminator. Obviously we'll want 'b' as a field, therefore one has to
> > assume either 1) the end
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 10:51:58AM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 10:10 AM Oğuz İsmail Uysal
> wrote:
> >
> > On 3/30/23 2:12 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > > IFS=,
> > > str='foo,bar,,roo,'
> > > printf '"%s"\n' $str
> > zsh is the only shell that
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 07:51:59 -0600
Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 5:23 AM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 05:12:46AM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > > IFS=,
> > > str='foo,bar,,roo,'
> > > printf '"%s"\n' $str
> > >
> > > There is a
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 10:10 AM Oğuz İsmail Uysal
wrote:
>
> On 3/30/23 2:12 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > IFS=,
> > str='foo,bar,,roo,'
> > printf '"%s"\n' $str
> zsh is the only shell that generates an empty last field, no other shell
> exhibits this behavior.
So? This is
On 3/30/23 2:12 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
IFS=,
str='foo,bar,,roo,'
printf '"%s"\n' $str
zsh is the only shell that generates an empty last field, no other shell
exhibits this behavior.
Besides your link says:
>The shell shall treat each character of the IFS as a delimiter
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 07:51:59AM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> But you can't replicate 'a,b' that way, because b does not have a
> terminator. Obviously we'll want 'b' as a field, therefore one has to
> assume either 1) the end of the string is considered an implicit
> terminator, or 2) the
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 5:23 AM Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 05:12:46AM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > IFS=,
> > str='foo,bar,,roo,'
> > printf '"%s"\n' $str
> >
> > There is a discrepancy between how this is interpreted between bash
> > and zsh: in bash the
how spooky , cant get read / mapfile to separate right
very sad
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023, 15:19 Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Consider this example:
>
> IFS=,
> str='foo,bar,,roo,'
> printf '"%s"\n' $str
>
> There is a discrepancy between how this is interpreted between bash
> and
Hi,
Consider this example:
IFS=,
str='foo,bar,,roo,'
printf '"%s"\n' $str
There is a discrepancy between how this is interpreted between bash
and zsh: in bash the last comma doesn't generate a field and is
ignored, in zsh a last empty field is generated. Initially I was going
to
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 05:12:46AM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> IFS=,
> str='foo,bar,,roo,'
> printf '"%s"\n' $str
>
> There is a discrepancy between how this is interpreted between bash
> and zsh: in bash the last comma doesn't generate a field and is
> ignored,
... which is
Hi,
Consider this example:
IFS=,
str='foo,bar,,roo,'
printf '"%s"\n' $str
There is a discrepancy between how this is interpreted between bash
and zsh: in bash the last comma doesn't generate a field and is
ignored, in zsh a last empty field is generated. Initially I was going
to
19 matches
Mail list logo
