Le 07/05/2010 16:02, Peng Yu a écrit :
I can copy the whole
directory and then modify one file in the newly copied N files. But
I'll lose track of which file has been changed later on, which is
important to me.
You will not lose track of the changed files: just run a recursive
diff comparing
On 5/9/10 10:37 AM, Peng Yu wrote:
Is there a way to define the operator ';' without touching the bash
source code?
No. The shell will not recognize it as a redirection, nor treat it as
an operator.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Peng Yu wrote:
Is there a way to overload operators like '' and '' in bash, just
as overloading in C++, etc. Suppose I have already made some bash
program using '' and '' without thinking about symbolic link, but I
begin aware
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Marc Herbert marc.herb...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 06/05/2010 15:53, Peng Yu a écrit :
Suppose that I have a symbolic link link1 pointing to file1. When I
write to link1, I don't want file1 change. I want it to remove the
link generated a new file and write to it.
On 05/07/2010 09:02 AM, Peng Yu wrote:
Suppose I need to modify one primary file slightly to do something a
little bit different. But I still need to do the original job,
therefore I need to keep it the original M files. I can copy the whole
directory and then modify one file in the newly
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/07/2010 09:02 AM, Peng Yu wrote:
Suppose I need to modify one primary file slightly to do something a
little bit different. But I still need to do the original job,
therefore I need to keep it the original M files. I
On 05/07/2010 09:31 AM, Peng Yu wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/07/2010 09:02 AM, Peng Yu wrote:
Suppose I need to modify one primary file slightly to do something a
little bit different. But I still need to do the original job,
therefore I
Le 07/05/2010 15:21, Peng Yu a écrit :
Would you please elaborate a little more on how to use LD_PRELOAD to
modify the call. If the library (for example, 'open' from stdlib.h)
is statically compiled in the binary, is LD_PRELOAD going to replace
it with a different 'open' function?
Header
Suppose that I have a symbolic link link1 pointing to file1. When I
write to link1, I don't want file1 change. I want it to remove the
link generated a new file and write to it.
pipe '' will change file 1. I'm wondering if there is way to do so,
so that I don't have to test whether it is a
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Peng Yu pengyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Suppose that I have a symbolic link link1 pointing to file1. When I
write to link1, I don't want file1 change. I want it to remove the
link generated a new file and write to it.
pipe '' will change file 1. I'm wondering if
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Pierre Gaston pierre.gas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Peng Yu pengyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Suppose that I have a symbolic link link1 pointing to file1. When I
write to link1, I don't want file1 change. I want it to remove the
link generated
Pierre Gaston wrote:
Peng Yu wrote:
Suppose that I have a symbolic link link1 pointing to file1. When I
write to link1, I don't want file1 change. I want it to remove the
link generated a new file and write to it.
pipe '' will change file 1. I'm wondering if there is way to do so,
so
Peng Yu wrote:
Is there a way to overload operators like '' and '' in bash, just
as overloading in C++, etc. Suppose I have already made some bash
program using '' and '' without thinking about symbolic link, but I
begin aware of them later. I would be cumbersome to add a test
statement and
13 matches
Mail list logo
