Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Why is [ 0 == 0 ] any more or less true than [ 0 -eq 0 ]?
The problem seems to be that this line is missing from the function:
local n ret1 ret2
You're right about that. The OP and I conversed via email and resolved
his questions.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the
Machine: i386
OS: freebsd4.11
Compiler: gcc
Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='i386' -DCONF_OSTYPE='
freebsd4.11' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='i386-unknown-freebsd4.11'
-DCONF_VENDOR='unknown'
-DLOCALEDIR='/home/lihongliang/libiconv/share/locale' -DPACKAGE='bash'
-DSHELL -DHAVE_CONFIG_H