Re: How to lock a terminal

2016-02-17 Thread Bob Proulx
Benno Schulenberg wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > I do not have a nanorc file at all. The defaults are okay for > > suspension without any specific configuration. > > ?? How does that work? What version of nano are you using? Since this has nothing to do bash I am going to take this to the

Re: How to lock a terminal

2016-02-16 Thread Bob Proulx
Benno Schulenberg wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > [...] this is the perfect case for job control. No need for a > > second terminal. Here is an example. Use Control-Z to stop the > > foreground job. > > For that to work, it requires having 'set suspend' in your > nanorc. (Which I don't have,

Re: How to lock a terminal

2016-02-16 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 16 Feb 2016 18:19, Bob Proulx wrote: > Nick Warne wrote: > > I was in a SSH session, and checking something inadvertently issued: > > > > > nano /var/log/messages | grep a > > > > (I was searching for something else than an 'a', but the above example shows > > the issue - about to use 'nano',

Re: How to lock a terminal

2016-02-16 Thread Nick Warne
OK, everybody, Thanks for the replies. As I stated, it was me being stupid - why I didn't think of Ctrl+Z I don't know - I have only been using GNU/Linux for 14 years :) Mind you, it was late and I was rushing to stop my Raspberry Pi connecting to the AP rather than the range extender.

Re: How to lock a terminal

2016-02-16 Thread Bob Proulx
Nick Warne wrote: > I was in a SSH session, and checking something inadvertently issued: > > > nano /var/log/messages | grep a > > (I was searching for something else than an 'a', but the above example shows > the issue - about to use 'nano', but then forgot to change it to 'cat'). > > The

Re: How to lock a terminal

2016-02-15 Thread John McKown
Try a Ctrl-X That worked for me with the exact same command line as yours. It exits nano. On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Nick Warne wrote: > Hi Everybody, > > I ma not sure if this is a bug, or if it is what causes it - if it isn't, > then it is me being stupid. > > I was