--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-04-04
06:02 ---
Can you attach some example binaries, please? It does not make sense that
x86-64 binaries produced by a modern version of GCC would produce stabs
debugging info. I suspect your debugging session has
--- Additional Comments From hochstein at algo dot informatik dot
tu-darmstadt dot de 2006-04-04 06:53 ---
Why not strive for it if it can be done easily?
I use avrora (http://compilers.cs.ucla.edu/avrora/) to simulate the AVR program
before writing it onto the real device. This
--- Additional Comments From dirkjan at magma-da dot com 2006-04-04 07:05
---
(In reply to comment #2)
Can you attach some example binaries, please? It does not make sense that
x86-64 binaries produced by a modern version of GCC would produce stabs
debugging info. I suspect your
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2006-04-04
08:05 ---
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils-cvs/2006-04/msg00013.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2006-04-04
08:06 ---
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils-cvs/2006-04/msg00013.html
--
What|Removed |Added
In intel syntax mode the following instruction fails:
movsd QWORD PTR [%esp], %xmm0
test.s: Assembler messages:
test.s:23: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `movsd'
If I write up the same code in ATT syntax and decompile it with objdump to
intel syntax I get the instruction out in the
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |amodra at bigpond dot net
|redhat dot com |dot au
