[Bug gas/2848] macro name syntax changed

--- Additional Comments From zippel at linux-m68k dot org 2006-07-26 11:21 --- (In reply to comment #3) > OK, so presumably a workaround is to provide individual macros with the > names "foo.b", "foo.w" and so on, rather than just one macro. This is not possible, if it has to work wit

[Bug gas/2848] macro name syntax changed

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-07-26 10:42 --- Created an attachment (id=1185) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1185&action=view) Add new GAS command line switch --no-dot-in-macro-names -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i

[Bug gas/2848] macro name syntax changed

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-07-26 10:41 --- Subject: Re: macro name syntax changed Hi Roman, > You read it correctly, the intention is to provide the opcodes > foo.b/foo.w/foo.l, so using "foo .l" would be even more confusing. OK, so presumably a workaro

Re: [Bug gas/2848] macro name syntax changed

Hi Roman, You read it correctly, the intention is to provide the opcodes foo.b/foo.w/foo.l, so using "foo .l" would be even more confusing. OK, so presumably a workaround is to provide individual macros with the names "foo.b", "foo.w" and so on, rather than just one macro. The point is tha

NOLOAD problem with binutils 2.16.92

Hi, I had posted a problem related to binutils 2.16.92 Please refer to the following link for the posted problem, http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2006-07/msg00041.html After further investigation, I found that this problem also exists for ARM and m32r targets also. Kindly let me k

[Bug ld/2729] ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault]

-- What|Removed |Added CC||dannysmith at users dot ||sourceforge dot net http://sourceware