[Bug ld/3015] New: -z relro by default causes testsuite failures

2006-08-08 Thread meissner at suse dot de
I enabled -z relro by default (link_info.relro = TRUE; in ldmain.c) This causes some of the testcases in ld to fail: FAIL: strip -z max-page-size=0x20 (maxpage1) FAIL: strip -z max-page-size=0x20 -z common-page-size=0x10 (maxpage1) FAIL: strip -z max-page-size=0x10 (maxpage1

[Bug binutils/2983] [patch] please do FreeBSD elfosabi marking also for amd64

2006-08-08 Thread vapier at gentoo dot org
--- Additional Comments From vapier at gentoo dot org 2006-08-09 00:43 --- looks like a follow up to this: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-07/msg00220.html cheers -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug gas/2971] Slash-star comments don't work for some x86 targets

2006-08-08 Thread caffer at cs dot ucc dot ie
--- Additional Comments From caffer at cs dot ucc dot ie 2006-08-09 00:14 --- Hi Nick, If the following condition is met, line_comment_chars consists of just "#": #if (defined (TE_I386AIX) \ || ((defined (OBJ_ELF) || defined (OBJ_MAYBE_ELF)) \

[Bug ld/2750] ld has problem with -shared, and GDB, SUN solaris 10 X86 (amd)

2006-08-08 Thread chong_guan_tan at yahoo dot com
--- Additional Comments From chong_guan_tan at yahoo dot com 2006-08-08 23:10 --- Subject: Re: ld has problem with -shared, and GDB, SUN solaris 10 X86 (amd) nick, your description is correct. I have built a version of medusa using sun ld and g++, called it medusa sun, and one using

[Bug ld/3006] --sort-section name is brorken

2006-08-08 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-08-08 16:09 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolut

[Bug ld/3006] --sort-section name is brorken

2006-08-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-08-08 15:59 --- Subject: Re: --sort-section name is brorken Hi H.J. > I think it is wrong. The problem is handler_data [1] is used for 2 things, > wildcard first. And then it was treated as tree later. I added 2 new tests > tod

Re: [Bug ld/3006] --sort-section name is brorken

2006-08-08 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi H.J. I think it is wrong. The problem is handler_data [1] is used for 2 things, wildcard first. And then it was treated as tree later. I added 2 new tests today. I think one of them may fail with your patch. I posted a patch at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-08/msg00080.html Ah - r

[Bug ld/3006] --sort-section name is brorken

2006-08-08 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-08-08 15:14 --- I think it is wrong. The problem is handler_data [1] is used for 2 things, wildcard first. And then it was treated as tree later. I added 2 new tests today. I think one of them may fail with your patch. I posted a patc

[Bug ld/3009] "ld --sort-section xxx" doesn't work with wildcard list

2006-08-08 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-08-08 15:09 --- Fixed by http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-08/msg00077.html -- What|Removed |Added St

[Bug gas/2971] Slash-star comments don't work for some x86 targets

2006-08-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-08-08 14:16 --- Hi Caffer, Which i386 targets do not have "/" in their line_comment_chars array ? As far as I can see all i386 targets have the forward slash in their line comment chars array, and since this array is parsed

[Bug ld/2864] Emitting code to a NOBITS section is not handled properly

2006-08-08 Thread yaari at il dot ibm dot com
--- Additional Comments From yaari at il dot ibm dot com 2006-08-08 14:07 --- People who can help you in reproducing the bug are Chij-Mehn Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I could not add them to the CC list. May be you could Yaakov -- http://sourcewa

[Bug ld/3006] --sort-section name is brorken

2006-08-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-08-08 14:05 --- Hi H.J. I am probably wrong, but this looks like a simple case of a missing check for a NULL pointer. The uploaded patch for example allows your test case to link successfully. What do you think ? Cheers Ni

[Bug ld/3006] --sort-section name is brorken

2006-08-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-08-08 14:04 --- Created an attachment (id=1213) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1213&action=view) Check for a tree node with no section specified -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3006

[Bug gas/3000] Disassembler: wrong operands are emitted with cvt* instructions

2006-08-08 Thread dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com
--- Additional Comments From dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com 2006-08-08 13:59 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Changes look fine to me. But you didn't list all new functions/macros in > ChangeLog entry. Also, should it be %mm instead of %mmx? Thanks. I have modified ChangeLog with all

[Bug ld/2729] ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault]

2006-08-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-08-08 13:57 --- Subject: Re: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault] Hi Martin, > I think the guys at MS applied their patches before you applied your PECOFF > stuff, and unfortunately, these patches didn't go back to

Re: [Bug ld/2729] ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault]

2006-08-08 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Martin, I think the guys at MS applied their patches before you applied your PECOFF stuff, and unfortunately, these patches didn't go back to upstream binutils. In their patches you can read some interesting comments, i.e. that they only support WEAK ALIAS, see below. It seems to me that the

[Bug gas/3000] Disassembler: wrong operands are emitted with cvt* instructions

2006-08-08 Thread dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com
-- What|Removed |Added Attachment #1212|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|| Attachment #1212 is|0 |1

[Bug gas/3000] Disassembler: wrong operands are emitted with cvt* instructions

2006-08-08 Thread dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com
--- Additional Comments From dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com 2006-08-08 13:55 --- Created an attachment (id=1212) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1212&action=view) ChangeLog -- What|Removed |Added -

Re: addr2line reports wrong line number for abort(), gdb reports correctly

2006-08-08 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Sam, gdb reports: (gdb) bt #0 0xe410 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xb7e989a1 in raise () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #2 0xb7e9a2b9 in abort () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #3 0x0804836b in level_aa () at ab.c:5 #4 0x0804838c in main () at ab.c:10 % addr2line -e ab 0x08048

[Bug ld/2864] Emitting code to a NOBITS section is not handled properly

2006-08-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-08-08 10:00 --- Hi Yaakov, Please could you provide a way to reproduce this problem, so that I can test it ? Also, please can you check to see if the problem still exists with version 2.17 of the binutils (the latest releas

[Bug ld/2750] ld has problem with -shared, and GDB, SUN solaris 10 X86 (amd)

2006-08-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-08-08 09:54 --- Hi Tan, Sorry for taking so long to get back to this issue. I am afraid I will not be able to visit you in Santa Clara since I am currently living in the UK... So, perhaps you can do some investigation for m

[Bug binutils/2768] readelf and segmented addresses in DWARF2/3 aranges

2006-08-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-08-08 09:42 --- Hi Stephane, My apologese for taking so long to get back to this issue. You are right - the addresses and lengths are being incorrectly truncated. I am going to apply the newly uploaded patch to fix this. C

[Bug binutils/2768] readelf and segmented addresses in DWARF2/3 aranges

2006-08-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-08-08 09:41 --- Created an attachment (id=1211) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1211&action=view) Display 8 byte addresses as 8 byte values -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2768 --

[Bug gas/2724] GAS segmentation fault when target=coff and enabled-target=elf

2006-08-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-08-08 08:20 --- Patch committed -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2724 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___