[Bug binutils/3171] New: efi-app-ia64 objcopy magic error

2006-09-04 Thread bibo dot mao at intel dot com
When converting ELF64 binary format into efi-app-ia64 format by objcopy command, optional header magic number in efi-app-ia64 target file is wrong. Originally its magic is 0x10b, it should be 0x20b. In Portable Executable and Common Object File Format Specification, it says that optional header

[Bug gas/3168] compiling gas fails on IRIX 5.3 with SGI ido cc; bug in dw2gencfi.c

2006-09-04 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
-- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3168 --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug gas/3168] compiling gas fails on IRIX 5.3 with SGI ido cc; bug in dw2gencfi.c

2006-09-04 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2006-09-05 01:54 --- Created an attachment (id=1281) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1281&action=view) likely fix This ought to fix your compile problem. Please verify. -- http://sourceware.org/bug

[Bug ld/3015] -z relro may create PT_NULL segment

2006-09-04 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-09-05 01:37 --- Subject: Re: -z relro may create PT_NULL segment > The patch fixing Linux/ia64 may also work for Linux/hppa. It works. Dave -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3015 --- Yo

[Bug ld/3169] elfxx-ia64.c doesn't support @ltoff(@fptr(_DYNAMIC#))

2006-09-04 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Additional Comments From tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-04 22:18 --- (In reply to comment #6) > _DYNAMIC is a special symbol. I don't think Osprey uses it correctly, if it > should be used by compiler at all. Thanks, I'll let them know about it. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/

[Bug ld/3169] elfxx-ia64.c doesn't support @ltoff(@fptr(_DYNAMIC#))

2006-09-04 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Summary|ld elf64-ia64.c segfault in |elfxx-ia64.c doesn't support |set_fptr_entry |@ltoff(@fptr(_DYNAMIC#)) http://

[Bug ld/3169] ld elf64-ia64.c segfault in set_fptr_entry

2006-09-04 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
PROTECTED] 3169]$ cat bar.S .text .align 16 .proc bar# bar: addl r14 = @ltoff(@fptr(foo#)), gp .endp bar# [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3169]$ make cc -c bar.S cc -c foo.s ./ld -o libfoo.so -shared bar.o foo.o ./ld: BFD 2.17.50 20060904 assertion fail elf64-ia64.c:4882

[Bug ld/3169] ld elf64-ia64.c segfault in set_fptr_entry

2006-09-04 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Additional Comments From tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-04 20:42 --- Created an attachment (id=1279) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1279&action=view) asm -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3169 --- You are receiving this mail because: --

[Bug ld/3169] ld elf64-ia64.c segfault in set_fptr_entry

2006-09-04 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Additional Comments From tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-04 20:42 --- Created an attachment (id=1278) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1278&action=view) preprocessed source -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3169 --- You are receiving this

[Bug ld/3169] ld elf64-ia64.c segfault in set_fptr_entry

2006-09-04 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-09-04 20:32 --- Please also provide the source and the assembly output. It is possible that the assembly output doesn't follow the ia64 psABI. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug ld/3015] -z relro may create PT_NULL segment

2006-09-04 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-09-04 20:29 --- The patch fixing Linux/ia64 may also work for Linux/hppa. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3015 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watc

[Bug ld/3015] -z relro may create PT_NULL segment

2006-09-04 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-04 19:25 --- I'm seeing these fails on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu: FAIL: strip -z relro -shared (maxpage1) FAIL: objcopy -z relro -shared (maxpage1) -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug binutils/3166] --only-keep-debug doesn't work on .o files with group

2006-09-04 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-09-04 16:30 --- If --only-keep-debug isn't supposed to be used on .o, we shouldn't try. As for group, a group can contain a debug section. I will open a new bug. The problem is when we strip a section, we don't ajust the section grou

[Bug binutils/3166] --only-keep-debug doesn't work on .o files with group

2006-09-04 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2006-09-04 13:19 --- please ignore last comment. my buildsystem was buggy :) -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3166 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watc

[Bug binutils/3166] --only-keep-debug doesn't work on .o files with group

2006-09-04 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2006-09-04 13:10 --- hmm, with this patch i get an error on shared libs. i486-gnu-linux-objcopy --only-keep-debug \ ../../build-stlport-release-i486-gnu-linux/libArmInstanceAdder.so \ ../../build-stlport-release-i486-gnu-linux/libArm

[Bug binutils/3166] --only-keep-debug doesn't work on .o files with group

2006-09-04 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2006-09-04 13:02 --- (In reply to comment #4) > The uploaded patch should resolve this. Please > could you try it out and let me know if it works for you. it works for me. thank you very much. ps). i've filled one more bug about stripp

[Bug binutils/3166] --only-keep-debug doesn't work on .o files with group

2006-09-04 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-09-04 12:35 --- Created an attachment (id=1277) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1277&action=view) Do not treat group sections as debugging sections -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3166

[Bug binutils/3166] --only-keep-debug doesn't work on .o files with group

2006-09-04 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-09-04 12:34 --- Hi Pawel, Hi H.J. The --only-keep-debug switch is not intended to work on object files (or static libraries containing object files). At least not those that contain relocations that point into the debug sectio