[Bug gas/10856] [2.20 regression] gas creates wrong code which results in a test failure in libcrypto++'s sha2 test

2009-12-14 Thread gingold at adacore dot com
--- Additional Comments From gingold at adacore dot com 2009-12-14 09:04 --- Subject: Re: [2.20 regression] gas creates wrong code which results in a test failure in libcrypto++'s sha2 test On Dec 13, 2009, at 6:55 PM, david-sarah at jacaranda dot org wrote: --- Additional

Re: [Bug gas/10856] [2.20 regression] gas creates wrong code which results in a test failure in libcrypto++'s sha2 test

2009-12-14 Thread Tristan Gingold
On Dec 13, 2009, at 6:55 PM, david-sarah at jacaranda dot org wrote: --- Additional Comments From david-sarah at jacaranda dot org 2009-12-13 17:55 --- Any indication of when this fix is likely to get into a release? The more OS distributions as 2.20 goes into, the more problems

[Bug gas/11086] build failed

2009-12-14 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-12-14 11:01 --- Hi Yoshinori-san, Thanks for reporting this bug and supply the fix. I have applied your patch along with the changelog entry below. Cheers Nick gas/ChangeLog 2009-12-14 Yoshinori Sato

ld crash (target x86_64-w64-mingw32 mutilib gcc)

2009-12-14 Thread xxcv
Hi I just compiled today's binutils and find it crash at link. ccache x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -m32 -o lua.exe -s lua.o lua51.dll -lm collect2: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20091214 ___ bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/10924] Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries

2009-12-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-14 16:38 --- Subject: Bug 10924 CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2009-12-14 16:38:23 Modified files: opcodes: ChangeLog arm-dis.c

[Bug binutils/10924] Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries

2009-12-14 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-12-14 16:39 --- Created an attachment (id=4467) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4467action=view) More tests for unpredictable instructions -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10924

[Bug binutils/10924] Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries

2009-12-14 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-12-14 16:46 --- Hi Chris, I have checked in another patch (which should be in tomorrow's tarball) to fix the new cases you found and also to correct the snafu when post indexed addressing is used with an immediate offset 15.

[Bug ld/11088] Internal Error in ppc64_elf_gc_sweep_hook

2009-12-14 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2009-12-14 23:40 --- I'd like to know why we have the failure before you apply your patch, Nick. Especially since there's a similar ppc32 report but no testcase. In looking over the ppc32 code I found a number of problems

[Bug binutils/10924] Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries

2009-12-14 Thread chris at seberino dot org
--- Additional Comments From chris at seberino dot org 2009-12-15 02:20 --- Subject: Re: Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 04:46:12PM -, nickc at redhat dot com wrote: There are also several situations where unpredictable