[Bug binutils/11396] objcopy adds IMAGE_FILE_RELOCS_STRIPPED for PIE

2010-03-17 Thread ken dot lu at intel dot com
-- What|Removed |Added CC||ken dot lu at intel dot com http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11396 --- You are receiving th

How to ‘make dist’?

2010-03-17 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, What’s the usual way to build a Binutils tarball? The top-level ‘dist’ target hints at etc/ but I don’t see anything appropriate there. (I’m asking because I’m currently looking at continuously building Binutils at .) Thanks, Ludo’. _

[Bug binutils/11396] objcopy adds IMAGE_FILE_RELOCS_STRIPPED for PIE

2010-03-17 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-17 23:23 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-03/msg00237.html -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug binutils/11396] objcopy adds IMAGE_FILE_RELOCS_STRIPPED

2010-03-17 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-17 22:34 --- It has nothing to do with the empty .reloc section. It is because -pie. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11396 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC lis

[Bug binutils/11396] New: objcopy adds IMAGE_FILE_RELOCS_STRIPPED

2010-03-17 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
According to PE-COFF spec, IMAGE_FILE_RELOCS_STRIPPED means -- Image only, Windows CE, and Microsoft Windows NT® and later. This indicates that the file does not contain base relocations and must therefore be loaded at its preferred base address. If the base address is not available, the loader r

[Bug ld/6443] -pie issues with TLS relocations

2010-03-17 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-17 13:22 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug gas/11395] New: gas creates 64bit add-instruction in 32bit mode for hppa2.0

2010-03-17 Thread haubi at gentoo dot org
GNU-as (2.19, 2.20) for hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.31 creates a different bytecode for the "ADD" instruction compared to HP-as, when .LEVEL is set to "2.0". There is no difference when .LEVEL is set to "1.1". Using this assembly file as input: $ cat > xx20.s < xx20.gnu.asm $ /usr/ccs/bin/as xx20.s -o xx2

[Bug binutils/11382] Missing FILE * casts in bfd/plugin.c

2010-03-17 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-03-17 10:41 --- Fixed mainline with http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2010-03/msg00084.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11382 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC l

[Bug binutils/11383] bin2c cannot link because it requires libintl

2010-03-17 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-03-17 07:26 --- Fixed on mainline http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-01/msg00336.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11383 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for