http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15538
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15602
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15602
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
---
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15602
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
In the real world the offset is signed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15602
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se ---
Nick,
Your patch works for me, with the following adjustment:
--- binutils-2.23.52/gas/config/tc-m68k.c.~1~ 2013-06-12 18:06:35.983916253
+0200
+++
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15612
Bug ID: 15612
Summary: ld 2.23.52.20130612 (debian) fails to find
__gthrw_pthread_cancel symbols after incremental link
on non-x86
Product: binutils
Version:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15602
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at sourceware dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15302
--- Comment #4 from Terry Guo terry.guo at arm dot com ---
Created attachment 7076
-- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7076action=edit
A proposal to fix this bug
Hello Nick and Pavel,
I am inspired by Nick's patch and
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15302
Terry Guo terry.guo at arm dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat