[Bug binutils/16373] new option -o for objdump

2013-12-27 Thread ilg at livius dot net
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16373 --- Comment #4 from Liviu Ionescu --- if -o (as an option to redirect the output) is an appropriate solution for the GNU compiler/linker and for countless other programs (most GNU programs in fact), I fail to see why objdump is so special that

[Bug binutils/16373] new option -o for objdump

2013-12-27 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16373 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- How is adding the -o option not a kludge? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binuti

[Bug binutils/16373] new option -o for objdump

2013-12-27 Thread ilg at livius dot net
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16373 --- Comment #2 from Liviu Ionescu --- come on, using scripts in this case is a kludge, not to mention that invoking them is not portable between Windows and Unix. my Eclipse plug-in adds three more steps to the usual build process, after link

[Bug binutils/16373] new option -o for objdump

2013-12-27 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16373 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- Just create a script that wraps around objdump and handles the redirection. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bu

[Bug binutils/16373] new option -o for objdump

2013-12-27 Thread ilg at livius dot net
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16373 Liviu Ionescu changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement -- You are receiving this

[Bug binutils/16373] New: new option -o for objdump

2013-12-27 Thread ilg at livius dot net
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16373 Bug ID: 16373 Summary: new option -o for objdump Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils