[Bug gas/16765] New: Assertion failure in create_unwind_entry

2014-03-27 Thread fab...@ritter-vogt.de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16765 Bug ID: 16765 Summary: Assertion failure in create_unwind_entry Product: binutils Version: 2.24 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas

[Bug ld/16746] ld complains about .gnu.warning symbols referenced by linker plugin inputs

2014-03-27 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16746 --- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gdb and binutils". The branch,

[Bug ld/16746] ld complains about .gnu.warning symbols referenced by linker plugin inputs

2014-03-27 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16746 --- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gdb and binutils". The branch,

[Bug ld/16744] '-z noexecstack' does not add .note.GNU-stack for relocatables

2014-03-27 Thread dh.herrmann at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16744 --- Comment #6 from David Herrmann --- Looks good. I cannot tell whether the flags are correct, but seems fine. Thanks! Symbol table from "objdump -t" with patch applied is: SYMBOL TABLE: ld .rodata

[Bug ld/16744] '-z noexecstack' does not add .note.GNU-stack for relocatables

2014-03-27 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16744 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug ld/16756] Incorrect warning message

2014-03-27 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16756 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/12760] LTO doesn't work with .gnu.warning section

2014-03-27 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12760 --- Comment #12 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gdb and binutils". The branch

[Bug ld/16756] Incorrect warning message

2014-03-27 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16756 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gdb and binutils". The branch,

[Bug ld/16761] [PATCH] fix parallel make for cygwin/mingw target

2014-03-27 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16761 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/16761] [PATCH] fix parallel make for cygwin/mingw target

2014-03-27 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16761 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gdb and binutils". The branch,

[Bug ld/16744] '-z noexecstack' does not add .note.GNU-stack for relocatables

2014-03-27 Thread dh.herrmann at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16744 --- Comment #4 from David Herrmann --- Full target is: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binuti

[Bug gas/16763] RL78 - Ranges of relative branches are not checked correctly

2014-03-27 Thread peper03 at yahoo dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16763 --- Comment #1 from Richard Hulme --- Sorry, typo in the 16-bit test: .list .global _branchTest8 .global _branchTest16 _branchTest8: br $label8 .zero 200 br $_branchTest8 label8: ret _branchTest16:

[Bug gas/16763] New: RL78 - Ranges of relative branches are not checked correctly

2014-03-27 Thread peper03 at yahoo dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16763 Bug ID: 16763 Summary: RL78 - Ranges of relative branches are not checked correctly Product: binutils Version: 2.24 Status: NEW Severity: critical

[Bug ld/16744] '-z noexecstack' does not add .note.GNU-stack for relocatables

2014-03-27 Thread vapier at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16744 --- Comment #3 from Mike Frysinger --- (In reply to David Herrmann from comment #2) that's the CPU, not the OS/userland. what does ./config.guess show? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug ld/12760] LTO doesn't work with .gnu.warning section

2014-03-27 Thread nheghathivhistha at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12760 David Kredba changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nheghathivhistha at gmail dot com --