https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16858
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #7600|0 |1
is
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16858
--- Comment #14 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Hi Bernd,
Actually here is a better patch. The previous one also affected non-code
weak symbols which was the wrong thing to do.
Please try this patch out and let me know if
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16858
--- Comment #15 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #14)
Hi Bernd,
Actually here is a better patch. The previous one also affected non-code
weak symbols which was the wrong
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16858
--- Comment #16 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Hi Bernd,
both variants of your patch do not affect x86_64, only 32-bit?
Yes. According to my test the x86_64 target is already working. (After the
first patch was applied).
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16952
Bug ID: 16952
Summary: PowerPC LD requests bug report. Issue related to EABI
symbols _SDA_BASE_, _SDA2_BASE_
Product: binutils
Version: 2.25 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16858
--- Comment #17 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #16)
Hi Nick,
yes, now it works for me. Thanks.
Maybe you should also add a test case for this mess.
--
You are receiving this
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16946
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16946
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16946
--- Comment #5 from Masaki MURANAKA mon...@monami-software.com ---
Hello Nick,
As you said, I'm using a git head of gcc-4_7 (old).
I got better messages after applied your patch:
```
