[Bug ld/17324] ld -r not generate cantunwind records in .ARM.exidx section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 Florian Weimer fweimer at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fweimer at

[Bug ld/17324] ld -r not generate cantunwind records in .ARM.exidx section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

Re: [Bug binutils/17329] Error: PC relative branch to label foo which is not in the instruction space

Hi Thomas, Summary: it's the combination of an optimization flag (-O) with debugging symbols (-g) that fails. So, after all, maybe it's more a gcc issue than a binutils issue? Almost certainly. The bug is probably that gcc is generating a short version of a branch instruction (on

[Bug binutils/17329] Error: PC relative branch to label foo which is not in the instruction space

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17329 --- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com --- Hi Thomas, Summary: it's the combination of an optimization flag (-O) with debugging symbols (-g) that fails. So, after all, maybe it's more a gcc issue than a binutils issue?

[Bug ld/17369] New: The PF_X bit is set on PT_PHDR segment

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17369 Bug ID: 17369 Summary: The PF_X bit is set on PT_PHDR segment Product: binutils Version: 2.25 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld

[Bug gold/14675] No eh_frame info registered in exception_static_test

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14675 Cary Coutant ccoutant at google dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug gold/17366] gold can't handle a crt1.o with an .eh_frame

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17366 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail