https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19547
--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 8952
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8952=edit
A patch
Please try this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19547
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Andrei Borzenkov from comment #10)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9)
> > A testcase:
> >
>
> Thanks! Do you still need it from me or is it OK?
Is my testcase close to yours? If yes, no
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19547
--- Comment #12 from Andrei Borzenkov ---
It's pretty much the same. Thank you!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19553
Bug ID: 19553
Summary: linking against libs that require pthreads breaks due
to symbol changes
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18720
Mike Frysinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||19553
Referenced Bugs:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19553
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=aef28989904e92e391fee905e51abc6bb2fd4de0
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19553
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
[hjl@gnu-6 pr19553]$ cat pr19553a.c
extern void foo (void);
int
main (void)
{
foo ();
return 0;
}
[hjl@gnu-6 pr19553]$ cat pr19553b.c
#include
__attribute__ ((weak))
void
foo (void)
{
printf
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19520
--- Comment #11 from Mike Frysinger ---
a 2.26.1 most likely will be released, but i think we might want to let the
list of regressions settle first :x
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19553
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.27
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19553
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
A patch is posted at
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2016-02/msg00035.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19547
--- Comment #7 from Andrei Borzenkov ---
I attached 3 x86 objects.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19542
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #8 from Markus
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19547
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19547
--- Comment #2 from Andrei Borzenkov ---
Created attachment 8949
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8949=edit
Source module before strip
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19547
--- Comment #3 from Andrei Borzenkov ---
Created attachment 8950
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8950=edit
After strip using binutils 2.17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Hi Michael,
Shifting into and out of the sign bit of an integer is undefined, and
this loop unconditionally does both. The below patch should fix it.
Patch approved and applied. Thanks for reporting this.
Cheers
Nick
___
bug-binutils mailing
Nick Clifton wrote:
> > Shifting into and out of the sign bit of an integer is undefined,
> > and this loop unconditionally does both. The below patch should fix
> > it.
>
> Patch approved and applied. Thanks for reporting this.
Thanks!
This idiom also appears in newlib and in various versions
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19542
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19547
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19547
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
A testcase:
[hjl@gnu-6 pr19547]$ cat bar.c
static char grub_module_license[]__attribute__ ((used)) ="foobar";
[hjl@gnu-6 pr19547]$ make
gcc -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -g -O -c -o bar.o bar.c
./objcopy
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19547
--- Comment #10 from Andrei Borzenkov ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9)
> A testcase:
>
Thanks! Do you still need it from me or is it OK?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19311
--- Comment #17 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=4f1d62057fa4894e504458027ac3228404144f7d
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19311
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19549
Bug ID: 19549
Summary: ld.gold internal error on ARM with recursive linking
Product: binutils
Version: 2.27 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19547
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Version|unspecified
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19547
Andrei Borzenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #5 from Andrei
26 matches
Mail list logo