https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21040
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Cary Coutant :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6624f3a142811450fab7eed1f406c4a030c3c9be
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21040
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_28-branch branch has been updated by Cary Coutant
:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20876
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Klose ---
applying this on top of your patch works for me. The global debug directory
doesn't have the dirname of the original file, so don't append `canon_dir'.
Not sure if that needs to be stripped from the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21040
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Cary Coutant :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=976e204b369fd01f9d35d87ea2cd07707c3a40cf
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21040
--- Comment #1 from Cary Coutant ---
> gold/powerpc.cc:2013: warning: comparison is always false due to limited
> range of data type
Alan, I'll leave this one to you. Not sure whether you want to cast addr to
uint64_t or not.
--
You are
On 01/11/2017 01:49 AM, Pavel Shishpor wrote:
Could please someone advice is it a bug or a feature when we get both
bodies of the functions with the same name in the executable once
multiple symbol definitions are allowed? Here is the example showing the
behavior:
The only thing that the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21040
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21040
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_28-branch branch has been updated by Cary Coutant
:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21039
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21039
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_28-branch branch has been updated by Cary Coutant
:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21039
--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Cary Coutant :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1fa5f68bf38fc29f173990614db70fed1b66c0e0
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21040
Bug ID: 21040
Summary: Gold fails with GCC 4.2
Product: binutils
Version: 2.29 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gold
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21039
Bug ID: 21039
Summary: Tests fail on i386-linux
Product: binutils
Version: 2.29 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gold
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21038
--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9e65917652e994b0864b344bfa47014155d93100
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21038
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20876
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #9746|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21038
Bug ID: 21038
Summary: Incorrect unwind info for BND PLT
Product: binutils
Version: 2.29 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20828
Maciej W. Rozycki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13442
Matt Godbolt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at godbolt dot org
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20876
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #3
Hello,
Could please someone advice is it a bug or a feature when we get both
bodies of the functions with the same name in the executable once multiple
symbol definitions are allowed? Here is the example showing the behavior:
$ cat main.c
int f() {return 6;}
int main() { return f();}
$ cat a.c
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20828
--- Comment #14 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Hi Maciej!
(In reply to Maciej W. Rozycki from comment #12)
> There's been no further feedback from other people and myself I haven't
> made up my mind about this bug yet, so if you are
22 matches
Mail list logo