[Bug binutils/21282] New: Cannot compile Binutils with ASAN because of memory leak in sysinfo.c

2017-03-20 Thread thuanpv at comp dot nus.edu.sg
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21282 Bug ID: 21282 Summary: Cannot compile Binutils with ASAN because of memory leak in sysinfo.c Product: binutils Version: 2.29 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug binutils/21281] New: Cannot compile Binutils with ASAN because of a memory leak bug in sysinfo.c

2017-03-20 Thread thuanpv at comp dot nus.edu.sg
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21281 Bug ID: 21281 Summary: Cannot compile Binutils with ASAN because of a memory leak bug in sysinfo.c Product: binutils Version: 2.29 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug binutils/17512] libbfd/binutils: crashes on fuzzed samples

2017-03-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512 --- Comment #234 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Mark Wielaard : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=39e224f6f9ee3f6123d4c9ddb7c0955e0604c1b4 commit 39e224f6f9ee3f6123d4c9dd

[Bug binutils/21233] Internal error, /usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.28 assertion fail ../../bfd/elfxx-mips.c:3861

2017-03-20 Thread ma...@linux-mips.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21233 Maciej W. Rozycki changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED --- Comment #8 from Maci

[Bug ld/21251] Support $SYSROOT in ld -L and INPUT command

2017-03-20 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21251 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug binutils/21233] Internal error, /usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.28 assertion fail ../../bfd/elfxx-mips.c:3861

2017-03-20 Thread james410 at cowgill dot org.uk
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21233 --- Comment #7 from James Cowgill --- I think I see the problem, you need to pass -fPIE when building main.o to trigger the bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/21233] Internal error, /usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.28 assertion fail ../../bfd/elfxx-mips.c:3861

2017-03-20 Thread james410 at cowgill dot org.uk
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21233 --- Comment #6 from James Cowgill --- I've attached the built objects. They were built with Debian's mips cross compiler: $ mipsel-linux-gnu-gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=mipsel-linux-gnu-gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc-cross/

[Bug binutils/21233] Internal error, /usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.28 assertion fail ../../bfd/elfxx-mips.c:3861

2017-03-20 Thread james410 at cowgill dot org.uk
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21233 --- Comment #5 from James Cowgill --- Created attachment 9923 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9923&action=edit alpha-lib.so built with GCC 6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/21233] Internal error, /usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.28 assertion fail ../../bfd/elfxx-mips.c:3861

2017-03-20 Thread james410 at cowgill dot org.uk
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21233 --- Comment #4 from James Cowgill --- Created attachment 9922 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9922&action=edit main.o built with GCC 6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug binutils/21233] Internal error, /usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.28 assertion fail ../../bfd/elfxx-mips.c:3861

2017-03-20 Thread ma...@linux-mips.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21233 Maciej W. Rozycki changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ld/21274] ld segfaults linking PE DLL

2017-03-20 Thread kyrab at mail dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21274 --- Comment #5 from awson --- Thanks for the patch, but I afraid I won't be able to test it in the near future. (I had understood your first comment correctly, but after some thinking I've decided that staying with fixed-sized buffer is bette

[Bug ld/21274] ld segfaults linking PE DLL

2017-03-20 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21274 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- Created attachment 9921 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9921&action=edit Remove symbol name limit This is what I had in mind to fix this problem. I don't normally use PE, so this pat

[Bug ld/21274] ld segfaults linking PE DLL

2017-03-20 Thread kyrab at mail dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21274 awson changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #9907|0 |1 is obsolete|