[Bug ld/21441] New: Unnecessary padding of .eh_frame section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21441 Bug ID: 21441 Summary: Unnecessary padding of .eh_frame section Product: binutils Version: 2.29 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component:

[Bug binutils/21437] heap-buffer-overflow in byte_get_little_endian (binutils/elfcomm.c:148)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21437 --- Comment #3 from Brian 'geeknik' Carpenter --- Without AFL and ASan: valgrind -q binutils/readelf -a ../test000 ELF Header: Magic: 7f 45 4c 46 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 ff ff ff ff Class: Data:

[Bug binutils/21437] heap-buffer-overflow in byte_get_little_endian (binutils/elfcomm.c:148)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21437 --- Comment #2 from Brian 'geeknik' Carpenter --- Built `da3d25a` with afl-gcc instead of afl-clang-fast. Same result. And I was mistaken in my original comment, this is Ubuntu 16.x, not Debian 8. gcc (Ubuntu 6.3.0-12ubuntu2) 6.3.0 20170406

[Bug binutils/21437] heap-buffer-overflow in byte_get_little_endian (binutils/elfcomm.c:148)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21437 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment

[Bug ld/21334] [MIPS] Undefined hidden symbols cause assertion failure bfd/elfxx-mips.c:3860

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21334 --- Comment #15 from Gianfranco --- makes sense, thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org

[Bug ld/21334] [MIPS] Undefined hidden symbols cause assertion failure bfd/elfxx-mips.c:3860

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21334 --- Comment #14 from Maciej W. Rozycki --- It's there on master: ld/testsuite/ld-mips-elf/pr21334.*; not backported to 2.28 to avoid new features (`readelf -A' static GOT addition) on a release branch. -- You are

[Bug binutils/21440] Malicious PE with invalid extended relocation can cause binutils/objdumo 2.28 to allocate any-size big memory

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21440 --- Comment #1 from jgj212 at gmail dot com --- Credit:The bug was discovered by ADLab of Venustech -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils

[Bug ld/21334] [MIPS] Undefined hidden symbols cause assertion failure bfd/elfxx-mips.c:3860

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21334 --- Comment #13 from Gianfranco --- Hello, can we have the testcase added to the testsuite to avoid regressions? thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/21440] Malicious PE with invalid extended relocation can cause binutils/objdumo 2.28 to allocate any-size big memory

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21440 jgj212 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |critical -- You are

[Bug binutils/21440] New: Malicious PE with invalid extended relocation can cause binutils/objdumo 2.28 to allocate any-size big memory

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21440 Bug ID: 21440 Summary: Malicious PE with invalid extended relocation can cause binutils/objdumo 2.28 to allocate any-size big memory Product: binutils