[Bug ld/22269] Undefined weak symbols isn't resolved to 0 in static PIE

2017-10-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22269 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #4) > I agree that undefined weak symbols probably ought to resolve to 0 in a > static PIE. To do that on ppc it would be reasonable to add the following > to elf32.em

[Bug ld/22269] Undefined weak symbols isn't resolved to 0 in static PIE

2017-10-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22269 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #6) > Why do you think the powerpc testcase should have no dynamic relocs? The > one dyanmic reloc is on a GOT slot (for in y.c). It looks fine to me. Oops. I was

[Bug ld/22274] sec64k test time out

2017-10-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22274 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/22274] sec64k test time out

2017-10-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22274 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=fc3c534364ca6d6de4f0dbcaf347ec85f5e2f8ff commit

[Bug ld/22269] Undefined weak symbols isn't resolved to 0 in static PIE

2017-10-09 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22269 --- Comment #6 from Alan Modra --- Why do you think the powerpc testcase should have no dynamic relocs? The one dyanmic reloc is on a GOT slot (for in y.c). It looks fine to me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug ld/22274] sec64k test time out

2017-10-09 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22274 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target|riscv64-linux |riscv64-linux, |

[Bug ld/22274] New: sec64k test time out

2017-10-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22274 Bug ID: 22274 Summary: sec64k test time out Product: binutils Version: 2.30 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld

[Bug ld/20828] GC-ed DSO symbols make corresponding symbols defined by a linker script local

2017-10-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20828 --- Comment #39 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9d45a7de8b80336b9965ee99353c34be85b1b98f commit

[Bug binutils/22249] objdump --dwarf-start can be very slow

2017-10-09 Thread tromey at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22249 --- Comment #4 from Tom Tromey --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #2) > * According to the documentation the --dwarf-start=N command line option > (which sets the dwarf_start_die variable) specifies the *number* of the DIE > at

[Bug gold/22268] ld.gold accepts "foo = ~0xFF" in linker script while ld.bfd - not.

2017-10-09 Thread georgerim at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22268 georgerim at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug gas/22272] New: Output of testsuite/gas/all/fill-1.s isn't verified

2017-10-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22272 Bug ID: 22272 Summary: Output of testsuite/gas/all/fill-1.s isn't verified Product: binutils Version: 2.30 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug ld/22269] Undefined weak symbols isn't resolved to 0 in static PIE

2017-10-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22269 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #4) > I agree that undefined weak symbols probably ought to resolve to 0 in a > static PIE. To do that on ppc it would be reasonable to add the following > to elf32.em

[Bug ld/22267] ld.bfd does not accept "foo = ~0xFF" in linker script but accepts "foo = ~ 0xFF"

2017-10-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22267 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/22267] ld.bfd does not accept "foo = ~0xFF" in linker script but accepts "foo = ~ 0xFF"

2017-10-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22267 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=76f361eb4934dcda0626517c311b34fbc92d09b9 commit

[Bug binutils/22249] objdump --dwarf-start can be very slow

2017-10-09 Thread mark at klomp dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22249 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mark at klomp dot org --- Comment #3

[Bug binutils/22249] objdump --dwarf-start can be very slow

2017-10-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22249 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|