https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21874
--- Comment #19 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #18)
> (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #17)
> > This is a tentative patch which could replace the bad one. Only tested on
> > 2.29.1 so far.
>
> Does GCC behave the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22434
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|addr2line doesn't use debug |dwarf2.c doesn't use debug
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22434
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22233
James Clarke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jrtc27 at jrtc27 dot com
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22434
Josh Poimboeuf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jpoimboe at redhat dot com
--
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22431
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22434
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22434
Bug ID: 22434
Summary: addr2line inline resolving doesn't work with split
dwarf
Product: binutils
Version: 2.29
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22426
--- Comment #3 from ky ---
Apologies for missing this out, the command used to run both test case is
“./objcopy ./FILE_NAME” where terminal is in the directory of objcopy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22426
--- Comment #2 from ky ---
(In reply to ky from comment #0)
> Created attachment 10584 [details]
> testcase that crashes objcopy
>
> hello, during a fuzzing attempt on objcopy in binutils (2.26.1), fuzzed file
> produces a crash when a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22426
--- Comment #1 from ky ---
Created attachment 10588
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10588=edit
memory exhaustion
added another test case for memory exhaustion
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21874
--- Comment #18 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #17)
> This is a tentative patch which could replace the bad one. Only tested on
> 2.29.1 so far.
>
Does GCC behave the same with and without -asm=intel with your
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21874
--- Comment #17 from Jan Beulich ---
This is a tentative patch which could replace the bad one. Only tested on
2.29.1 so far.
--- 2.29.1/gas/config/tc-i386-intel.c
+++ 2.29.1/gas/config/tc-i386-intel.c
@@ -411,7 +413,19 @@ static int
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22233
--- Comment #2 from Peter Smith ---
This is related to PR21868, the fix for that PR has a bug that triggers when
the stub_owner section also needs erratum fixes. In this case the address of
the thunks is not calculated correctly, resulting in
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22233
Peter Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter.smith at linaro dot org
---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22431
--- Comment #1 from Murilo Opsfelder Araújo ---
Talking to Alan Modra, he mentioned that this `is the combination of -pie,
undefined weak symbols, and a kernel script that throws away .plt that triggers
the ld segfault`.
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22431
Murilo Opsfelder Araújo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|binutils|ld
--
You are receiving
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22431
Murilo Opsfelder Araújo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64*-linux-gnu
--
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21874
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #15)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12)
> > (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #11)
> > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10)
> > > > Do you have a real
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22431
Murilo Opsfelder Araújo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael at ellerman dot
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22431
Murilo Opsfelder Araújo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mopsfelder at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22431
Murilo Opsfelder Araújo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22431
Bug ID: 22431
Summary: ld (binutils-2.29) segfaults when building Linux
kernel (v4.14) on Fedora 26 ppc64le
Product: binutils
Version: 2.29
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21874
--- Comment #15 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12)
> (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #11)
> > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10)
> > > Do you have a real example?
> >
> > No, I don't. But I don't assume you
24 matches
Mail list logo