https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22868
--- Comment #8 from Cary Coutant ---
I've just committed a gold patch that adds a --debug=plugin option. This will
create a temporary directory under your current working directory named
"gold-record-X", and will store a log file and copie
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22948
--- Comment #5 from Ryan Scott ---
Wonderful, thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gn
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22883
--- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi H.J.
> Yes, the object file is bad. It uses RELA, but stores relocations
> like REL. Which assembler generates it?
Unknown. I have asked the reporter of the original bug how it was created.
(The ori
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22948
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22948
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f6c4d4b152a985f355cd1552ce01c99a589c936f
commit f6c4d4b152a985f355cd1552ce0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22883
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #1)
> I don't see how the Gnu linker is making this work. All your PLT32
> relocations are missing the "-4" bias for a pc-relative reference. As far as
> I can see, gold is
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22868
--- Comment #7 from georgerim at gmail dot com ---
For above case, a.o and b.o objects have symbols f1 with different visibility.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22868
--- Comment #6 from georgerim at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #5)
> I'm not able to reproduce this problem in my test framework. Whether or not
> we override the symbol when scanning the IR, we still pick up the visi
