https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22755
--- Comment #3 from Andreas K. Huettel ---
Created attachment 11105
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11105=edit
gold/config.log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22755
Andreas K. Huettel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|2.30|2.31
--
You are receiving this
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23348
--- Comment #1 from Jacek Caban ---
Created attachment 11104
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11104=edit
test-stripped-by-binutils.exe
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22755
Andreas K. Huettel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|gold test suite failures|gold test suite failures
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23348
Jacek Caban changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-w64-mingw32
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23348
Bug ID: 23348
Summary: binutils strip corrupts binaries produced by
clang+lld+mingw-w64 toolchain
Product: binutils
Version: 2.32 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Hi Ask,
> But what if by accident I change it to %pA? In between the thousands
> of messages and dozens of languages, the probability of this happening
> approaches one (Murphy's law). I mischievously typed "%pA" instead,
> and it produced no error.
Hmm, well mistakes can always happen, and I