[Bug gold/22755] gold test suite failures (gentoo, 2.31)

2018-06-27 Thread dilfridge at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22755 --- Comment #3 from Andreas K. Huettel --- Created attachment 11105 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11105=edit gold/config.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gold/22755] gold test suite failures (gentoo, 2.31)

2018-06-27 Thread dilfridge at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22755 Andreas K. Huettel changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.30|2.31 -- You are receiving this

[Bug binutils/23348] binutils strip corrupts binaries produced by clang+lld+mingw-w64 toolchain

2018-06-27 Thread jacek at codeweavers dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23348 --- Comment #1 from Jacek Caban --- Created attachment 11104 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11104=edit test-stripped-by-binutils.exe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gold/22755] gold test suite failures (gentoo, 2.31)

2018-06-27 Thread dilfridge at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22755 Andreas K. Huettel changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|gold test suite failures|gold test suite failures

[Bug binutils/23348] binutils strip corrupts binaries produced by clang+lld+mingw-w64 toolchain

2018-06-27 Thread jacek at codeweavers dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23348 Jacek Caban changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-w64-mingw32 -- You are

[Bug binutils/23348] New: binutils strip corrupts binaries produced by clang+lld+mingw-w64 toolchain

2018-06-27 Thread jacek at codeweavers dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23348 Bug ID: 23348 Summary: binutils strip corrupts binaries produced by clang+lld+mingw-w64 toolchain Product: binutils Version: 2.32 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED

Re: Translatable strings not marked 'c-format'

2018-06-27 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Ask, > But what if by accident I change it to %pA? In between the thousands > of messages and dozens of languages, the probability of this happening > approaches one (Murphy's law). I mischievously typed "%pA" instead, > and it produced no error. Hmm, well mistakes can always happen, and I