https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23938
wuheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|binutils|gas
--
You are receiving this mail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23938
Bug ID: 23938
Summary: should not free memory alloced in obstack by free()
Product: binutils
Version: 2.32 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23937
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_31-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=0f494b01431de53959dd72ccfed06a01d5172e3f
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23937
--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ba85c15dabe144e4bcee5a1b388b32bee10729e1
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23937
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23937
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le-linux
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23937
Bug ID: 23937
Summary: powerpc64le local ifunc IRELATIVE relocs are wrong
Product: binutils
Version: 2.32 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23935
Bug ID: 23935
Summary: ld.bfd does not rescan fat LTO archives to resolve
plugin-added references
Product: binutils
Version: 2.32 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23919
Dmitry V. Levin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ldv at sourceware dot org
--
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23933
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23931
--- Comment #3 from Paul Koning ---
Great. I agree fixing the check is best. I looked at the code but it wasn't
clear to me how to do that, so I did the disable as a crude test.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23933
Bug ID: 23933
Summary: gold_assert(len >= this->do_minimum_hole_size()) fails
Product: binutils
Version: 2.32 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23929
--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ffd9e4d0225d45d1603d09e06151c388589e063f
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23928
--- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Werner
> I installed all necessary debug symbols; however, the very last call is
> still shown as `??' in the backtrace (deep in dlopened stuff).
What about the function before the '??'. That will
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23931
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23931
--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8936f76804c2908e4abe911441dd03641204df9d
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23932
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|interger overflow causes a |integer overflow causes an
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23930
--- Comment #2 from Artem Savkov ---
The workaround fixes both the reproducer and original kernel build for me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
18 matches
Mail list logo