[Bug gas/23997] PLT32 relocation is off by 4

2018-12-18 Thread nruslan_devel at yahoo dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23997 --- Comment #5 from Ruslan Nikolaev --- or another possibility -- is to output some warning -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing

[Bug gas/23997] PLT32 relocation is off by 4

2018-12-18 Thread nruslan_devel at yahoo dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23997 --- Comment #4 from Ruslan Nikolaev --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3) > (In reply to Ruslan Nikolaev from comment #2) > > Sometimes when the assembly code is for both PIC and non-PIC code, you may > > From x86-64 psAB: > > name@PLT:

[Bug gas/23997] PLT32 relocation is off by 4

2018-12-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23997 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Ruslan Nikolaev from comment #2) > Sometimes when the assembly code is for both PIC and non-PIC code, you may >From x86-64 psAB: name@PLT: specifies the offset to the PLT entry of symbol name

[Bug binutils/24005] New: objdump integer overflow in load_specific_debug_section

2018-12-18 Thread yanshb at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24005 Bug ID: 24005 Summary: objdump integer overflow in load_specific_debug_section Product: binutils Version: 2.32 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical

[Bug binutils/24005] objdump integer overflow in load_specific_debug_section

2018-12-18 Thread yanshb at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24005 --- Comment #1 from ShengBo Yan --- Created attachment 11474 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11474=edit patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/23997] PLT32 relocation is off by 4

2018-12-18 Thread nruslan_devel at yahoo dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23997 --- Comment #2 from Ruslan Nikolaev --- Sometimes when the assembly code is for both PIC and non-PIC code, you may want to use this construction. I checked LLVM/clang; it compiles correct output in both cases. -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug binutils/24002] A memory leak issue was discovered in cplus-dem.c

2018-12-18 Thread wcventure at 126 dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24002 --- Comment #1 from wcventure --- Created attachment 11471 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11471=edit POC2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/24002] New: A memory leak issue was discovered in cplus-dem.c

2018-12-18 Thread wcventure at 126 dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24002 Bug ID: 24002 Summary: A memory leak issue was discovered in cplus-dem.c Product: binutils Version: 2.31 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug binutils/24001] New: A memory leak issue was discovered in function debug_init in debug.c

2018-12-18 Thread wcventure at 126 dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24001 Bug ID: 24001 Summary: A memory leak issue was discovered in function debug_init in debug.c Product: binutils Version: 2.31 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug binutils/24001] A memory leak issue was discovered in function debug_init in debug.c

2018-12-18 Thread wcventure at 126 dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24001 --- Comment #1 from wcventure --- Created attachment 11469 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11469=edit POC2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.