[Bug ld/25677] Changes to --*magic options for pdp11-aout target

2020-03-27 Thread casner at acm dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25677 --- Comment #2 from Stephen Casner --- I could use some guidance regarding running the testsuite. After reading the binutils porting document I have installed dejagnu, but I don't know what information is needed in the global config, for

[Bug gas/25738] spam

2020-03-27 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25738 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC|amodra at gmail dot com| -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug gas/25738] spam

2020-03-27 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25738 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|yeezy |spam Resolution|---

[Bug gas/25738] spam

2020-03-27 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25738 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com -- You are

Issue 20180 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_bfd: Timeout in fuzz_bfd

2020-03-27 Thread sheriffbot via monorail
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #4 on issue 20180 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_bfd: Timeout in fuzz_bfd https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=20180#c4 This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot --

[Bug gas/25732] test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

2020-03-27 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 --- Comment #14 from Rainer Orth --- > --- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu --- > (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #11) > >> >> That leaves us with the two pr20995-2 ones... >> > >> > Does Solaris support GNU_RELRO? If not, I can skip these for

[Bug gas/25732] test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

2020-03-27 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 --- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #11) > >> That leaves us with the two pr20995-2 ones... > > > > Does Solaris support GNU_RELRO? If not, I can skip these for Solaris. > > I'm pretty certain it doesn't.

[Bug gas/25732] test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

2020-03-27 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 --- Comment #12 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=258e884429c87ed5ebee2b7767e3955218ec064b commit

[Bug gas/25732] test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

2020-03-27 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 --- Comment #11 from Rainer Orth --- > --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- >> FAIL: ld-ifunc/ifunc-23a-x86 >> FAIL: ld-ifunc/ifunc-24a-x86 >> FAIL: ld-ifunc/ifunc-25a-x86 >> >> the last three are highly dubious: Solaris ld.so.1 doesn't

[Bug gas/25732] test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

2020-03-27 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #8) > > --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- > > > I stopped checking Solaris cross target since the result isn't clean. > > If Solaris cross target test becomes clean, I

[Bug gas/25732] test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

2020-03-27 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 --- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=cacb9d871376da293c655efce8cf3a4f2feefbaa commit

[Bug gas/25732] test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

2020-03-27 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 --- Comment #8 from Rainer Orth --- > --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- > I stopped checking Solaris cross target since the result isn't clean. > If Solaris cross target test becomes clean, I will test Solaris cross I doubt I will be able to

[Bug gas/25732] test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

2020-03-27 Thread levon at movementarian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 --- Comment #7 from John Levon --- Ah, I didn't notice those weren't gas. I only ran gas and binutils, not ld. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/25732] test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

2020-03-27 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #5) > > --- Comment #4 from John Levon --- > > It's only the last 5 for me (running natively, but illumos not Solaris) > > That's most likely because gld testing assumes

[Bug gas/25732] test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

2020-03-27 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 --- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth --- > --- Comment #4 from John Levon --- > It's only the last 5 for me (running natively, but illumos not Solaris) That's most likely because gld testing assumes a gcc configured to use gld without an

[Bug gas/25732] test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

2020-03-27 Thread levon at movementarian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 --- Comment #4 from John Levon --- It's only the last 5 for me (running natively, but illumos not Solaris) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/25732] test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

2020-03-27 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|gas test-suite failures |test-suite failures with

[Bug gas/25738] New: yeezy

2020-03-27 Thread niuyu185 at 163 dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25738 Bug ID: 25738 Summary: yeezy Product: binutils Version: 2.34 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned

[Bug gas/25732] gas test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

2020-03-27 Thread levon at movementarian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 John Levon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org -- You are

[Bug gas/25732] gas test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

2020-03-27 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug binutils/23788] objcopy: src/steddNxf: failed to find link section for section 24

2020-03-27 Thread johnkaitlyn95 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23788 --- Comment #12 from Kaitlyn John --- This article is so helpful for me. I have follow the steps shared here. It was so beneficial for me. Thanks for sharing this useful tips which helped in fixing the issue easily. Hope to see more useful

[Bug binutils/23788] objcopy: src/steddNxf: failed to find link section for section 24

2020-03-27 Thread johnkaitlyn95 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23788 Kaitlyn John changed: What|Removed |Added CC||johnkaitlyn95 at gmail dot com ---

[Bug binutils/25662] objcopy sets invalid sh_offset for the first section in a no_contents segment containing program headers

2020-03-27 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25662 --- Comment #11 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Jozef Lawrynowicz : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1fafefd59438f92206e65ea6b2022d82c5ccfe12 commit

[Bug binutils/25737] New: Document which readelf and binutils options support debuginfod

2020-03-27 Thread marxin.liska at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25737 Bug ID: 25737 Summary: Document which readelf and binutils options support debuginfod Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: