https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25806
Fangrui Song changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25677
--- Comment #11 from Stephen Casner ---
Created attachment 12448
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12448=edit
Completed patch including tests and doc
Here is a patch against a current git pull that I believe includes
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25750
--- Comment #8 from Jian Cai ---
Hi Nick,
Thanks for the feedback. First all of, apology and correction to the code
example I came up with in
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25750#c4. It should be
.macro foo insn1 insn2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16017
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16017
--- Comment #31 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_34-branch branch has been updated by Tamar Christina
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=aaf3f0599a210699a76767c07a7d7f62d7633d71
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25803
--- Comment #2 from gagan singh sidhu (gagz, broly, w/e u want) ---
so it is being looked at? i couldn't udpate the importance of the other post,
nor give other important information;. this an important issue. i wish i was as
familiar with
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25803
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22302
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
*** Bug 25803 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25803
Bug ID: 25803
Summary: cross compilation of glibc using
mips64el-none-linux-gnu as the host
Product: binutils
Version: 2.35 (HEAD)
URL:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25802
Bug ID: 25802
Summary: Several 64-bit SPARC tests FAIL: relocation truncated
to fit
Product: binutils
Version: 2.35 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25599
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16673
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24613
--- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Fangrui,
> -Wl,--warn-unresolved-symbols is very rare. Making `-z defs
> --warn-unresolved-symbols` warn rather than error may be fine. It is
> unlikely to cause a friction.
OK - would you like to
13 matches
Mail list logo