[Bug ld/27171] R_AMD64_DIR64/R_AMD64_DIR32 static address relocation

2021-01-11 Thread minnowware at hotmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27171 --- Comment #4 from Kilian Kegel --- Created attachment 13115 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13115=edit screen shot Hi H.J. please find the appended screen shot. This patch works - perfect. Thanks a lot, Kilian

[Bug ld/26766] Support standalone PGO build

2021-01-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26766 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.37 Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/27173] binutils builds broken on ubuntu 18.04

2021-01-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27173 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/26766] Support standalone PGO build

2021-01-11 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26766 --- Comment #24 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=44124a46839b3563e448edfd013c6faa6a8b1642 commit

[Bug binutils/27173] binutils builds broken on ubuntu 18.04

2021-01-11 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27173 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=83b33c6cb90db6c110bff0d5024713e8af747005 commit

[Bug binutils/27173] binutils builds broken on ubuntu 18.04

2021-01-11 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27173 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=03c02f3116d75721f917c4155cefb18b940a43ff commit

[Bug binutils/27173] binutils builds broken on ubuntu 18.04

2021-01-11 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27173 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|amodra at gmail dot com|hjl.tools at gmail dot com

[Bug binutils/27173] binutils builds broken on ubuntu 18.04

2021-01-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27173 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- Patches are posted at https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-January/114879.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/27171] R_AMD64_DIR64/R_AMD64_DIR32 static address relocation

2021-01-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27171 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|R_X86_64_PC32 static|R_AMD64_DIR64/R_AMD64_DIR32

[Bug ld/27171] R_X86_64_PC32 static address relocation

2021-01-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27171 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 13114 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13114=edit A patch Please try this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/27173] binutils builds broken on ubuntu 18.04

2021-01-11 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27173 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com

[Bug ld/26766] Support standalone PGO build

2021-01-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26766 --- Comment #23 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Martin Liska from comment #22) > Kudos H.J. > Can we close this as resolved? --enable-pgo-build=lto fails with binutils 2.30 since ar in binutils 2.30 doesn't support $ ar --plugin

[Bug ld/27171] R_X86_64_PC32 static address relocation

2021-01-11 Thread minnowware at hotmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27171 Kilian Kegel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||minnowware at hotmail dot com

[Bug ld/27171] R_X86_64_PC32 static address relocation

2021-01-11 Thread minnowware at hotmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27171 Kilian Kegel changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.35.1 |2.37 (HEAD) -- You are receiving

[Bug ld/27167] Missing -mipsXXX LD command line flags

2021-01-11 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27167 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/27167] Missing -mipsXXX LD command line flags

2021-01-11 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27167 --- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_36-branch branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=dee726de9b1b5e6eaa1d1869c68d8e443646e72a commit

[Bug ld/27167] Missing -mipsXXX LD command line flags

2021-01-11 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27167 --- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c0f6e439cc59fa60fec3a4c4ff56e6fac52a8c65 commit

[Bug ld/27167] Missing -mipsXXX LD command line flags

2021-01-11 Thread matt at majenko dot co.uk
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27167 --- Comment #5 from Matt Jenkins --- Sure thing. I've retained the -mips5 flag which GCC doesn't seem to use, just in case there's some other source that flag could come from. It's doing no harm being there. -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug ld/27167] Missing -mipsXXX LD command line flags

2021-01-11 Thread matt at majenko dot co.uk
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27167 --- Comment #4 from Matt Jenkins --- Created attachment 13113 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13113=edit Patch for mips flags -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/27167] Missing -mipsXXX LD command line flags

2021-01-11 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27167 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment

[Bug binutils/27155] objcopy --only-keep-debug should strip .debug_info symbols

2021-01-11 Thread mliska at suse dot cz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27155 Martin Liska changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

Issue 29483 in oss-fuzz: binutils: Fuzzing build failure

2021-01-11 Thread amo… via monorail
Comment #1 on issue 29483 by amo...@gmail.com: binutils: Fuzzing build failure https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=29483#c1 See https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27173 -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may

[Bug binutils/27173] binutils builds broken on ubuntu 18.04

2021-01-11 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27173 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com -- You are

[Bug binutils/27173] binutils builds broken on ubuntu 18.04

2021-01-11 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27173 --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- PR13256 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/27173] binutils builds broken on ubuntu 18.04

2021-01-11 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27173 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.36|2.37 (HEAD) -- You are receiving this

[Bug binutils/27173] New: binutils builds broken on ubuntu 18.04

2021-01-11 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27173 Bug ID: 27173 Summary: binutils builds broken on ubuntu 18.04 Product: binutils Version: 2.36 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils

[Bug ld/27167] Missing -mipsXXX LD command line flags

2021-01-11 Thread matt at majenko dot co.uk
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27167 --- Comment #2 from Matt Jenkins --- Actually, there's a couple more missing. From GCC's `--target-help`: Known MIPS ISA levels (for use with the -mips option): 1 2 3 32 32r2 32r3 32r5 32r6 4 64 64r2 64r3 64r5 64r6 -mips64r3 and

[Bug ld/27167] Missing -mipsXXX LD command line flags

2021-01-11 Thread matt at majenko dot co.uk
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27167 --- Comment #1 from Matt Jenkins --- On further investigation there is no MIPS32R4, so the -mips32r4 flag could be removed from that list. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

Issue 27734 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_readelf: Abrt with empty stacktrace

2021-01-11 Thread amo… via monorail
Comment #4 on issue 27734 by amo...@gmail.com: binutils:fuzz_readelf: Abrt with empty stacktrace https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=27734#c4 Pull request here https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/pull/4945 -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd

[Bug ld/26766] Support standalone PGO build

2021-01-11 Thread mliska at suse dot cz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26766 --- Comment #22 from Martin Liska --- Kudos H.J. Can we close this as resolved? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

Issue 27734 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_readelf: Abrt with empty stacktrace

2021-01-11 Thread p . ant… via monorail
Comment #3 on issue 27734 by p.ant...@catenacyber.fr: binutils:fuzz_readelf: Abrt with empty stacktrace https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=27734#c3 Thanks Alan, could you push this patch upstream ? -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the