[Bug binutils/28759] ar: Add --thin to avoid 'T' conflict with X/Open System Interface

2022-01-11 Thread i at maskray dot me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28759 Fangrui Song changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/28759] ar: Add --thin to avoid 'T' conflict with X/Open System Interface

2022-01-11 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28759 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Fangrui Song : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d1b69c506f7855e5b90039abdadaf1d05b085c4c commit

[Bug gas/28762] [z80-unknown-elf-as]: assembly fails, but fixed with a blank line

2022-01-11 Thread sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28762 --- Comment #4 from Sergey Belyashov --- Bug is present in current development branch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/28762] [z80-unknown-elf-as]: assembly fails, but fixed with a blank line

2022-01-11 Thread petemoore at gmx dot net
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28762 Pete Moore changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.36.1 |2.37 --- Comment #3 from Pete Moore

[Bug binutils/28763] New: SIGSEGV during processing of program headers

2022-01-11 Thread nils_b...@t-online.de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28763 Bug ID: 28763 Summary: SIGSEGV during processing of program headers Product: binutils Version: 2.37 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug gas/28762] [z80-unknown-elf-as]: assembly fails, but fixed with a blank line

2022-01-11 Thread petemoore at gmx dot net
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28762 --- Comment #1 from Pete Moore --- Note, I didn't include all the output from all examples, but all of these actions were successful in removing the failure message: 1) Adding a blank line _anywhere_ before line 10290 2) Deleting any

[Bug gas/28762] [z80-unknown-elf-as]: assembly fails, but fixed with a blank line

2022-01-11 Thread petemoore at gmx dot net
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28762 Pete Moore changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #13898|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug gas/28762] New: [z80-unknown-elf-as]: assembly fails, but fixed with a blank line

2022-01-11 Thread petemoore at gmx dot net
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28762 Bug ID: 28762 Summary: [z80-unknown-elf-as]: assembly fails, but fixed with a blank line Product: binutils Version: 2.36.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

Re: readelf: also dump the address contained in offset on R_386_RELATIVE relocs

2022-01-11 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Andrea, I see that, when dumping R_386_RELATIVE relocs in readelf, the format is like this Offset InfoTypeSym.Value Sym. Name 3d01 0008 R_386_RELATIVE If I understand that type of relocation correctly, another information is missing: the address