[Bug binutils/31096] nm for mips32 (native or cross-compiled) shows 32bit addresses as sign-extended 64bit addresses

2023-12-05 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31096 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug binutils/31096] nm for mips32 (native or cross-compiled) shows 32bit addresses as sign-extended 64bit addresses

2023-12-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31096 --- Comment #5 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=3c8852fcc806915fdeab8b3d6f49be7347160527 commit 3c8852fcc806915fdeab8b3d6f49be7347160527

[Bug gas/31115] [ARM] The minimalistic DWARF DIE for function has wrong address in Thumb mode

2023-12-05 Thread thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31115 Thiago Jung Bauermann changed: What|Removed |Added Target||armv8l-linux-gnueabihf -- Yo

[Bug gas/31115] New: [ARM] The minimalistic DWARF DIE for function has wrong address in Thumb mode

2023-12-05 Thread thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31115 Bug ID: 31115 Summary: [ARM] The minimalistic DWARF DIE for function has wrong address in Thumb mode Product: binutils Version: 2.39 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug binutils/31106] strip --strip-debug breaks relocations

2023-12-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31106 --- Comment #13 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e60675a228a8ecd2cfdc7e45cb315a1838b91f74 commit e60675a228a8ecd2cfdc7e45cb315a1838b91

[Bug binutils/31106] strip --strip-debug breaks relocations

2023-12-05 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31106 --- Comment #12 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Stas Sergeev from comment #11) > OK, I checked that the new binary > works as expected. Ok, I will check in the patch. > If that's the problem, then I'd suggest > no not touch relocations at

[Bug binutils/31106] strip --strip-debug breaks relocations

2023-12-05 Thread stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31106 --- Comment #11 from Stas Sergeev --- OK, I checked that the new binary works as expected. Thank you! But I am really a bit disappointed if you leave the current objcopy behavior that can still remove relocations at will... Yes, I understand t

[Bug binutils/31106] strip --strip-debug breaks relocations

2023-12-05 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31106 --- Comment #10 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Stas, (In reply to Stas Sergeev from comment #8) > Hi, it would be easier if you just > provide the newly stripped binary. OK, I have uploaded a copy. > Have you considered to spare the > '--strip-d

[Bug binutils/31106] strip --strip-debug breaks relocations

2023-12-05 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31106 --- Comment #9 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 15237 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15237&action=edit Stripped file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/31106] strip --strip-debug breaks relocations

2023-12-05 Thread stsp at users dot sourceforge.net
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31106 --- Comment #8 from Stas Sergeev --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #7) > Created attachment 15236 [details] > Proposed patch > > Hi Stas, > > Please can you try out this patch ? Hi, it would be easier if you just provide the newl

[Bug binutils/31106] strip --strip-debug breaks relocations

2023-12-05 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31106 --- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 15236 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15236&action=edit Proposed patch Hi Stas, Please can you try out this patch ? The issue is that the relocation process