[Bug ld/31120] New: ld-scripts/fill2 fails when bfd_vma is 32 bits

2023-12-06 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31120 Bug ID: 31120 Summary: ld-scripts/fill2 fails when bfd_vma is 32 bits Product: binutils Version: 2.42 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug gprofng/31116] gprofng test fails with "comparison of results in synprog failed" on x86_64-linux-gnu

2023-12-06 Thread vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31116 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving

Issue 63742 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_objdump_safe: Segv on unknown address in bfd_getl32

2023-12-06 Thread sheriffbot via monorail
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 63742 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_objdump_safe: Segv on unknown address in bfd_getl32 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=63742#c3 This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly

Issue 63660 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_objdump: Direct-leak in xmalloc

2023-12-06 Thread sheriffbot via monorail
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 63660 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_objdump: Direct-leak in xmalloc https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=63660#c3 This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You

[Bug gprofng/31109] gprofng not built and installed in a combined binutils+gcc build

2023-12-06 Thread vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31109 --- Comment #7 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- I configured my gcc trank build: /configure --prefix=`pwd`/INSTALL --enable-gprofng I see the binutils-gdb targets in Makefile. For example: % grep gprof Makefile maybe-configure-gprof \

[Bug gas/31115] [ARM] The minimalistic DWARF DIE for function has wrong address in Thumb mode

2023-12-06 Thread thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31115 --- Comment #2 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1) > Created attachment 15240 [details] > Proposed patch > > Hi Thiago, > > Please could you try out this patch and let me know if it works for you ? >

[Bug gas/31115] [ARM] The minimalistic DWARF DIE for function has wrong address in Thumb mode

2023-12-06 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31115 --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 15240 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15240=edit Proposed patch Hi Thiago, Please could you try out this patch and let me know if it works for you ? Cheers

[Bug gas/31115] [ARM] The minimalistic DWARF DIE for function has wrong address in Thumb mode

2023-12-06 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31115 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nickc at redhat dot com

[Bug gprofng/31116] New: gprofng test fails with "comparison of results in synprog failed" on x86_64-linux-gnu

2023-12-06 Thread doko at debian dot org
edit test log this fails with trunk 20231206, attaching the test log. There seems to be something wrong with the shell script. In the /gprofng I see an unexpected file: ls builddir-single/gprofng/ '&1'config.logdoc gprofng.sumMakefile stamp