[Bug binutils/11297] Support for 8-bit relocations for AVR architecture

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11297 Andrew Zabolotny anpaza at mail dot ru changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug binutils/11297] Support for 8-bit relocations for AVR architecture

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11297 Andrew Zabolotny anpaza at mail dot ru changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug binutils/12914] New: dllwrap creates wrong DLLs with repeated fixups for same address

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12914 Summary: dllwrap creates wrong DLLs with repeated fixups for same address Product: binutils Version: 2.20 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug ld/11304] ld --section-start does not work correctly if section is defined in multiple object files

--- Additional Comments From anpaza at mail dot ru 2010-02-22 08:18 --- Tried the 22-Feb-2010 snapshot of binutils, same behavior. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11304 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug

[Bug ld/11304] ld --section-start does not work correctly if section is defined in multiple object files

-- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11304 --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug ld/11304] New: ld --section-start does not work correctly if section is defined in multiple object files

Product: binutils Version: 2.19 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: anpaza at mail dot ru CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org

[Bug ld/11304] ld --section-start does not work correctly if section is defined in multiple object files

--- Additional Comments From anpaza at mail dot ru 2010-02-21 22:31 --- Created an attachment (id=4616) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4616action=view) The makefile -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11304 --- You are receiving this mail

[Bug ld/11304] ld --section-start does not work correctly if section is defined in multiple object files

--- Additional Comments From anpaza at mail dot ru 2010-02-21 22:31 --- Created an attachment (id=4617) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4617action=view) the common header file -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11304 --- You are receiving

[Bug ld/11304] ld --section-start does not work correctly if section is defined in multiple object files

--- Additional Comments From anpaza at mail dot ru 2010-02-21 22:31 --- Created an attachment (id=4618) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4618action=view) first soufrce file -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11304 --- You are receiving

[Bug ld/11304] ld --section-start does not work correctly if section is defined in multiple object files

--- Additional Comments From anpaza at mail dot ru 2010-02-21 22:31 --- Created an attachment (id=4619) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4619action=view) second source file -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11304 --- You are receiving

[Bug ld/11290] ld's (for avr) internal error: out of range error message for unaligned relocations is confusing.

--- Additional Comments From anpaza at mail dot ru 2010-02-18 20:54 --- (In reply to comment #3) Thanks. I understand the issue. The assembler doesn't check that instruction addresses are not multiple of 2. Would be also cool to fix the error message. I also got it and had to look

[Bug binutils/11297] New: Support for 8-bit relocations for AVR architecture

Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: anpaza at mail dot ru CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC target triplet: avr-linux-gnu http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11297 --- You

[Bug binutils/11297] Support for 8-bit relocations for AVR architecture

--- Additional Comments From anpaza at mail dot ru 2010-02-18 21:01 --- Created an attachment (id=4609) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4609action=view) The patch against binutils 2.18 The patch is against latest stable binutils for AVR, hopefully it should apply

[Bug binutils/11297] Support for 8-bit relocations for AVR architecture

--- Additional Comments From anpaza at mail dot ru 2010-02-18 21:02 --- Created an attachment (id=4610) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4610action=view) A simple testcase demonstrating the AVR binutils limitation -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi