--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2010-01-25 19:59 ---
Subject: Re: ld generates bad long branch stubs
I wonder if this bug might be fixed by the patch I attached to
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10409
The patch causes testsuite
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2009-10-14 16:21 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: macros dot
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au wrote:
=== gas tests ===
Schedule of variations:
unix
Running target unix
Using /opt/gnu
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2009-10-11 19:24 ---
Subject: Re: Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au wrote:
Created an attachment (id=4265)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2009-10-10 23:50 ---
Subject: Re: Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel
I guess the hppa test failure is due to hppaelf_after_parse
if (link_info.relocatable)
lang_add_unique (.text);
I'd be inclined
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2009-06-22 14:01 ---
Subject: Re: ld: Dwarf Error: mangled line number section.
Hi Nick,
Can you create a standalone testcase to reproduce this problem ? I can
build
an hppa-linux-gnu compiler, but I do
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2008-09-21 20:17 ---
Subject: Re: TLS relocs prevent changing r19 to r27 when doing static link
with PIC code on PA
Is this a missing piece of the TLS implementation?
Yes. Thanks for looking into this.
Dave
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2008-01-02 20:12 ---
Subject: Re: eh support is broken
Created an attachment (id=2168)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2168action=view)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2008-01-01 19:03 ---
Subject: Re: eh support is broken
Do you have a testcase? (Preferably one with object files, so that
a hppa binutils would be enough.)
Regarding the frame table error, I have collected all
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-08-01 19:11 ---
Subject: Re: New: sha1.h:25:20: error: stdint.h: No such file or directory
Looks like this could be fixed by including bfd_stdint.h and
adding an appropriate dependency to Makefile.am.
Dave
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-05-08 03:51 ---
Subject: Re: [regression] ld errors: no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created.
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-05-05
22:50 ---
Created an attachment
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-05-02 23:42 ---
Subject: Re: New: [regression] ld errors: no .eh_frame_hdr table will be
created.
building the gcc-4.2.0 RC2 with binutils_20070426 on Debian unstable, some
hundred testcases fail like:
I
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2006-09-05 01:37 ---
Subject: Re: -z relro may create PT_NULL segment
The patch fixing Linux/ia64 may also work for Linux/hppa.
It works.
Dave
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3015
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2006-03-20 04:23 ---
Subject: Re: pie.exp: FAIL: weak undefined
Does PIE work on hppa at all?
My understanding is that it does when the dynamic loader issue
is fixed in libc6 2.3.6-1. It seems 2.3.6 was released
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2006-03-20 02:20 ---
Subject: Re: pie.exp: FAIL: weak undefined
See
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-02/msg00278.html
hppa may need a similar fix.
You mean something like:
Index: elf32-hppa.c
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2006-02-22 01:10 ---
Subject: Re: New: pie.exp: FAIL: weak undefined
tmpdir/weakundef: error while loading shared libraries: unexpected reloc type
0x
42
This is R_PARISC_PLABEL21L.
Dave
--
http
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-12-22 18:26 ---
Subject: Re: binutils.texi:3495: No such file or directory.
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-12-22 17:08
---
It works for me.
This was caused by using an old
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-11-19 16:50 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: weakref tests
Hey, it's the same FAILs as for mmix-knuth-mmixware!
Ever since rth's change from .set to = for these tests.
I scratched the host and build fields
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-11-12 20:45 ---
Subject: Re: binutils.texi:3495: No such file or directory.
Doesn't happen when not doing a cross.
Don't know why *that* case is different, but for the
Different PATHs caused different
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-11-07 00:38 ---
Subject: Re: Wrong output for 64-bit difference of labels
After all, if the fixup is for a dword, none of the insn handling code in
md_apply_fix is appropriate. In fact, it would be even
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-11-06 00:27 ---
Subject: Re: Wrong output for 64-bit difference of labels
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2005-11-05
08:36 ---
This is caused by tc-hppa.c:md_apply_fix
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-22 02:43 ---
Subject: Re: ELF input section may not be handled properly
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-10/msg00284.html
I hit this error:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../src
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-10 18:22 ---
Subject: Re: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-09 15:15
---
If you can provide all input files, I
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-10 20:43 ---
Subject: Re: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
This shouldn't be a problem since executable doesn't use any symbols in ld.so.
If you can provide a testcase, I will try
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-10 21:03 ---
Subject: Re: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Please provide all input files for me to reproduce it with a cross linker.
Attached.
Dave
--- Additional Comments
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-10 21:09 ---
Subject: Re: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 05:03:22PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
Please provide all input files for me to reproduce
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-10 21:33 ---
Subject: Re: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 09:17:12PM -, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-10 21:53 ---
Subject: Re: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 09:41:08PM -, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-11 02:55 ---
Subject: Re: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
You need to find out why those symbols aren't defined, given that
I just found the problem. It was an installation
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-03-07 14:43 ---
Subject: Re: Hiding _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ breaks function pointer
canonicalization
What|Removed |Added
29 matches
Mail list logo
