https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22737
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #4)
Thanks Nick for the jumpstart!
I've sent the updated patch to the ML.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22737
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #2)
>
> * A testcase (to gas/testsuite/gas/rx/) to check that the
> patch continues to work.
I have no idea about the gas testsuite. I need to feed it an .s file
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22737
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||rx*-*-*
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22737
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1 fr
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
This is a carry over from GCC's PR 83816
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83816
rx_start_line in tc-rx.c wrongly modifies the LTO escaped stri
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19935
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Mike Frysinger from comment #3)
> (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #2)
>
> sorry, i thought you were saying 2.26 wasn't working. i don't think there's
> any significant differences between 2.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15025
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19935
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Mike Frysinger from comment #1)
> does binutils 2.25 work ?
AFAIR yes. Before updating I was using 2.25-something and it was OK. 2.26
also looks OK.
> could you perhaps bisect the two ?
Yep.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19935
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||sh*-*-*
CC|
: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Comparing the GCC testsuite results for binutils 2.26 and current master
branch, there are lots of new execution failures on sh-sim. Just in case, I've
tried
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17739
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kkojima at rr dot iij4u.or.jp
--- Comment
||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3298
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10373
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10378
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
,
||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo ---
I believe this is a (partial) dup of PR 3298.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing
,
||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo ---
I believe this is a (partial) dup of PR 3298.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing
17 matches
Mail list logo
