[Bug binutils/30916] addr2line testsuite fails when targeting PowerPC 64 big-endian with ELFv2 ABI

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30916 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.42 -- You are receiving this mail beca

[Bug ld/30905] ld: Test case pr28158 fails on x86_64-linux-musl when index is > 19

||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/30940] alpha: ld segfaults in

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30940 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/22001] -z nocopyreloc doesn't work right

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22001 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/30930] ld-2.41 links mame in a way which gets stuck on aarch64

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30930 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nsz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #15 fr

[Bug ld/19985] ld/configure.tgt: LE ppc64 targets do not include BE emulations

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19985 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/30930] ld-2.41 links mame in a way which gets stuck on aarch64

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30930 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org See Also

[Bug ld/30925] ld testsuite: pr22001-1 test segfaults on musl/x86

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30925 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/30924] ld testsuite: 'Version' pattern grabs 'Version5 EABI', breaking test on arm-linux-musleabihf

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30924 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/30923] ld testsuite: Thumb PLT and GOT tests should be skipped on musl armhf targets

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30923 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/30917] ld testsuite: glibc-specific DT_RELR tests should not be run on musl systems

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30917 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/30918] ld testsuite: non-PIC shared tests fail on powerpc-linux-musl

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30918 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug binutils/30916] addr2line testsuite fails when targeting PowerPC 64 big-endian with ELFv2 ABI

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30916 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/30915] ld testsuite: visibility incorrectly marked XFAIL on musl targets

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30915 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/30907] ELF segment add extra 2 LOAD segments in aarch64, making binary bigger 128KiB than before

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30907 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug gprofng/30894] bison should be no hard dependency

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30894 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug gprofng/30893] gprofng uses syscall + perf_event (hwcdrv) and ptrace (gpcollect) without any check and doc

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30893 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug gprofng/30897] Support source view for "referenced" source (e.g. bison)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30897 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/30824] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.41 internal error, aborting at elf64-ppc.c:17531 in ppc64_elf_relocate_section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30824 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug binutils/30806] CPPFLAGS are missing for bfd/chew, syslex_wrap and sysinfo

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30806 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.42 -- You are receiving this mail beca

[Bug ld/30756] ld: -Wl, -z, pack-relative-relocs -Wl, --no-keep-memory goes OOM on i586 link

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30756 --- Comment #7 from Sam James --- Adam, are you hitting PR30566 maybe? It was fixed in 2.41. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/30566] -z pack-relative-relocs --no-keep-memory uses more memory than without --no-keep-memory

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30566 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/30756] ld: -Wl, -z, pack-relative-relocs -Wl, --no-keep-memory goes OOM on i586 link

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30756 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug binutils/30806] CPPFLAGS are missing for bfd/chew, syslex_wrap and sysinfo

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30806 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org --- Comment #1

[Bug gprofng/30575] gprofng cannot profile application with clone3()

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30575 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/30791] Do not merge sections with same name and SHF_LINK_ORDER, but different sh_link value

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30791 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/30685] bfd fails with lto on armhf and clang-16 (symbol from plugin): Number of symbols in input file has increased from 0 to 1

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30685 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://github.com/gentoo/g

[Bug ld/27659] BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.36.1 internal error, aborting at ../../bfd/elfcode.h:224 in bfd_elf32_swap_symbol_out

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27659 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/30685] bfd fails with lto on armhf and clang-16 (symbol from plugin): Number of symbols in input file has increased from 0 to 1

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30685 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|https://github.com/gentoo/g |https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/30685] bfd fails with lto on armhf and clang-16 (symbol from plugin): Number of symbols in input file has increased from 0 to 1

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30685 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/28441] [RISCV] ld linker relaxation is really slow

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28441 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug gprofng/30779] gprofng: fails to build with musl-1.2.4 (gprofng/src/Data_window.h:56:3: error: 'off64_t' does not name a type; did you mean 'off_t'?)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30779 --- Comment #3 from Sam James --- (In reply to Vladimir Mezentsev from comment #2) > [...] > My questions are: > How can I simply use/download musl-1.2.4 ? Unfortunately, I think Adelie is a bit out of date in general at the moment. Alpine e

[Bug ld/30787] DT_JMPREL/DT_PLTRELSZ incorrect when PLT and REL/RELA relocations share an ELF output section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30787 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com -- You are re

[Bug ld/30787] DT_JMPREL/DT_PLTRELSZ incorrect when PLT and REL/RELA relocations share an ELF output section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30787 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug gprofng/30779] gprofng: fails to build with musl-1.2.4 (gprofng/src/Data_window.h:56:3: error: 'off64_t' does not name a type; did you mean 'off_t'?)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30779 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- Downstream report: https://bugs.gentoo.org/912284 Full build log (xz compressed): https://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=867845 I can give more information if needed. -- You are receiving this mail becau

[Bug gprofng/30779] New: gprofng: fails to build with musl-1.2.4 (gprofng/src/Data_window.h:56:3: error: 'off64_t' does not name a type; did you mean 'off_t'?)

) Product: binutils Version: 2.41 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: sam at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- ``` /bin/sh ../libtool

[Bug binutils/28387] ld: Move R_*_TLSDESC to .rela.dyn

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28387 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/24458] Linker BFD 2.32 regression: __ehdr_start not useable in shared libraries: "relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol `__ehdr_start' can not be used when making a shared object;

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24458 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug ld/30722] ld tests 'Build property 3', 'Build property 4', 'Build property 5' fail (glibc-2.38?)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30722 --- Comment #11 from Sam James --- commit 646657284f6b62a71a6869826e951b3def4d73a6 (upstream/master) Author: Sam James Date: Wed Aug 16 07:21:53 2023 +0100 ld: ld-lib.exp: log failed dump.out contents for debugging If we're using

[Bug ld/30722] ld tests 'Build property 3', 'Build property 4', 'Build property 5' fail (glibc-2.38?)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30722 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.42 -- You are receiving this mail beca

[Bug ld/30722] ld tests 'Build property 3', 'Build property 4', 'Build property 5' fail (glibc-2.38?)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30722 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/30722] ld tests 'Build property 3', 'Build property 4', 'Build property 5' fail (glibc-2.38?)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30722 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #9

[Bug ld/30756] ld: -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs goes OOM on i586 link

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30756 --- Comment #5 from Sam James --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4) > (In reply to Adam Majer from comment #3) > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2) > > > Please try -Wl,-z,--no-keep-memory > > > > /usr/lib/gcc/i586-suse-linux/13/../.

[Bug ld/30722] ld tests 'Build property 3', 'Build property 4', 'Build property 5' fail (glibc-2.38?)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30722 --- Comment #7 from Sam James --- Created attachment 15067 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15067&action=edit 0002-ld-testsuite-adjust-property-3-4-a-5-test-cases-for-.patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug ld/30722] ld tests 'Build property 3', 'Build property 4', 'Build property 5' fail (glibc-2.38?)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30722 --- Comment #6 from Sam James --- Created attachment 15066 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15066&action=edit 0001-ld-ld-lib.exp-log-failed-dump.out-contents-for-debug.patch Sorry for not doing that before Nick, I'd sta

[Bug ld/30722] ld tests 'Build property 3', 'Build property 4', 'Build property 5' fail (glibc-2.38?)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30722 --- Comment #5 from Sam James --- Created attachment 15065 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15065&action=edit property-5-dump.out -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/30722] ld tests 'Build property 3', 'Build property 4', 'Build property 5' fail (glibc-2.38?)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30722 --- Comment #4 from Sam James --- Created attachment 15064 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15064&action=edit property-4.o-dump.out -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/30722] ld tests 'Build property 3', 'Build property 4', 'Build property 5' fail (glibc-2.38?)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30722 --- Comment #3 from Sam James --- Created attachment 15063 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15063&action=edit property-4-dump.out -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/30722] ld tests 'Build property 3', 'Build property 4', 'Build property 5' fail (glibc-2.38?)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30722 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- Created attachment 15062 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15062&action=edit property-3-dump.out -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/30768] X86: copy relocation against non-copyable protected symbol

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/30756] ld: -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs goes OOM on i586 link

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30756 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug binutils/30758] ODR violations in opcodes dir

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30758 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||22395 Referenced Bugs: https://sourcewa

[Bug ld/30698] ld test 'Run pr23169b' fails

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30698 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.42 Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/30758] ODR violations in opcodes dir

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30758 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/30732] ld: 'ELF weak (alias)' tests fail on hppa

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30732 --- Comment #14 from Sam James --- OK, I was wrong. I can reproduce it with our normal toolchain too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/30732] ld: 'ELF weak (alias)' tests fail on hppa

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30732 --- Comment #13 from Sam James --- Fixed the pattern, thanks. OK, back to alias. I can reproduce it consistently, but only on this machine so far. This machine is built with Gentoo's hardened profile, which has default PIE/relro/binding/_FOR

[Bug ld/2470] /opt/gnu64/bin/ld: main: Not enough room for program headers (allocated 5, need 6)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2470 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/29802] Segmentation fault in _bfd_elf_strtab_add

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29802 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug binutils/17840] [2.25 Regression] ar creates archives with incorrect LST system_id and magic

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17840 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/6906] TLS relocs prevent changing r19 to r27 when doing static link with PIC code on hppa

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6906 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org Summary

[Bug ld/30743] FAIL: ld-elf/now-3 for hppa64-*-linux* target

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30743 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/30744] FAIL: ld-elf/pr19539 for hppa64-*-linux*

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30744 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/30732] ld: 'ELF weak (alias)' tests fail on hppa

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30732 --- Comment #11 from Sam James --- (In reply to dave.anglin from comment #9) > Let's leave things as they are for the moment.  I will test hppa64 builds on > linux and hpux. I'll fix the pattern over the weekend (it's trivial ofc, just going

[Bug ld/30732] ld: 'ELF weak (alias)' tests fail on hppa

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30732 --- Comment #8 from Sam James --- (In reply to dave.anglin from comment #7) > On 2023-08-08 3:33 p.m., sam at gentoo dot org wrote: > > Thanks Dave, I've done that last night in > > https://inbox.sourceware.org

[Bug ld/30732] ld: 'ELF weak (alias)' tests fail on hppa

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30732 --- Comment #5 from Sam James --- (In reply to dave.anglin from comment #4) > Created attachment 15051 [details] > ld-hppa.d > > On 2023-08-08 12:16 p.m., danglin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > I see for GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.41.50.20230808:

[Bug gprofng/30700] tmpdir/gp-collect-app_F test fails

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30700 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.42 -- You are receiving this mail beca

[Bug ld/30733] ld: SHF_GNU_RETAIN 7a' test fail on hppa

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30733 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/30734] ld: 'relocatable with script' test fails on hppa

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30734 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/30734] ld: 'relocatable with script' test fails on hppa

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30734 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.42 Status|NEW

[Bug ld/30733] ld: SHF_GNU_RETAIN 7a' test fail on hppa

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30733 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug ld/29087] "non-canonical reference to canonical protected function" with protected visibility, -mno-direct-extern-access and virtual functions

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29087 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/30732] ld: 'ELF weak (alias)' tests fail on hppa

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30732 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug ld/30733] ld: SHF_GNU_RETAIN 7a' test fail on hppa

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30733 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/30734] ld: 'relocatable with script' test fails on hppa

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30734 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/30734] ld: 'relocatable with script' test fails on hppa

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30734 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.41|2.42 (HEAD) --- Comment #1 from Sam James

[Bug ld/30734] New: ld: 'relocatable with script' test fails on hppa

Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sam at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- $ ld/ld-new --version | head -1 GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.41.50.20230808 $ grep -rsin ^FAIL ./*/*.sum ./ld/ld.sum:502:FAIL: relocatable with script ./ld/ld.su

[Bug ld/30733] ld: SHF_GNU_RETAIN 7a' test fail on hppa

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30733 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- This one looks obvious - ./testsuite/ld-elf/retain7a.d has a skip for 'hppa-*-linux*' but that doesn't match 'hppa2.0-*'. I'll send a patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug ld/30733] New: ld: SHF_GNU_RETAIN 7a' test fail on hppa

t: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sam at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- $ ld/ld-new --version | head -1 GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.41.50.20230808 $ grep -rsin ^FAIL ./*/*.sum ./ld/ld.sum:502:FAIL: relocatable with script ./ld/ld.sum:512:FAIL: SHF_GNU_R

[Bug ld/30732] ld: 'ELF weak (alias)' tests fail on hppa

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30732 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- Created attachment 15048 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15048&action=edit bad-alias-segfault.tar.xz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/30732] New: ld: 'ELF weak (alias)' tests fail on hppa

Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sam at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 15047 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15047&action=edit ld.log.xz $ ld/ld-new --version | head -1 GNU

[Bug ld/13141] Confusing error message with --no-copy-dt-needed-entries

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13141 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/14826] ld flag --as-needed do not remove extra link

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14826 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/14603] no reloc emitted for ld generated veneers for ARM

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14603 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/14512] -z nodelete should be default for shared libraries

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14512 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/14512] -z nodelete should be default for shared libraries

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14512 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/14424] support for "identical code folding"

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14424 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/27230] ld: Add DWARF v5 sections and .debug_types to ld/scripttempl/DWARF.sc

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27230 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/27259] ld: Support SHF_LINK_ORDER self-link

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27259 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/26105] PROTECTED in executable

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26105 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/29656] Weak link symbol results in incorrect address resulting in segfault

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29656 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/30002] pr26391-5, pr26391-6 ld test failures on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu since 496afd17055aeb7d8f45e01715c475664f2b73bd

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.41 Status|NEW

[Bug ld/26551] A definition referenced by an unneeded (--as-needed) shared object should be exported

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26551 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug binutils/14435] use -fvisibility=hidden

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14435 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug binutils/21739] Inconsistent diagnostics

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21739 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug binutils/5546] add functionality to modify DT tags in ELF ways to binutils

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5546 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug binutils/21479] strip doesn't handle lto archives

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21479 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug binutils/23401] binary size increases for ARM between 2.29.1 and 2.30

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23401 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug binutils/24319] Compressed / uncompressed debug info confusion in BFD

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24319 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug binutils/24400] ia64: binutils regression leads to gcc stage2/stage3 compare failure

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24400 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug binutils/28698] objdump is very slow in some cases

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28698 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >