--- Additional Comments From shap at eros-os dot com 2008-04-16 02:53
---
This seems like a poor solution, since the number of object files out there is
very large.
If you *do* adopt this approach, are the fixed object files still compatible
with *older* versions of binutils? It would
--- Additional Comments From shap at eros-os dot com 2007-12-21 18:13
---
Subject: Re: INTOUCH instruction incorrectly disassembled.
On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 17:13 +, nickc at redhat dot com wrote:
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-12-21 17:13
--- Additional Comments From shap at eros-os dot com 2007-12-18 15:59
---
Created an attachment (id=2149)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2149action=view)
Revised patch, splitting CPUSHL per suggestion
This patch splits CPUSHL as suggested (I think -- would
--- Additional Comments From shap at eros-os dot com 2007-12-07 22:01
---
Created an attachment (id=2127)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2127action=view)
Fix to mask values for cpush* instructions on m68k target.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
--- Additional Comments From shap at eros-os dot com 2007-12-08 02:27
---
Hmm. Thank you for pointing that out.
Actually, M68000PRM specifies that if that field is 0 then the operation is a
no-op. While the encoding is hypothetically legal, the definition of the
assembly language
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: shap at eros-os dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: any m68k mcfisa_b or mcfisa_c target
http://sourceware.org
