https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28435
Thorsten Glaser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tg at mirbsd dot de
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28435
--- Comment #2 from Thorsten Glaser ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943274 as well…
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12180
--- Comment #12 from Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot de 2010-11-04 09:39:41
UTC ---
No, I didn’t do anything special to build, I just ran dpkg-buildpackage, and
it does a three-stage bootstrap then uses the stage3 compiler to build the
RTL
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12180
Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12157
Summary: m68k statement ignored syntax error when
@TLSLDO+4(%a0)
Product: binutils
Version: 2.20
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12157
Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||m68k-linux-gnu
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||tg at mirbsd dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10144
--- You are receiving this mail
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10144
--- You are receiving this mail because:
--- Additional Comments From tg at mirbsd dot de 2010-01-23 18:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=4550)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4550action=view)
Testcase #3 (with .c .s .o/.so)
(In reply to comment #4)
Works for me with FSF versions of GCC and binutils
--- Additional Comments From tg at mirbsd dot de 2010-01-03 16:44 ---
I think there may be a documentation or bug issue left:
You are testing for:
ljmp0x9090,0x90909090
ljmp0x9090:0x90909090
jmp 0x9090,0x90909090
jmp 0x9090:0x90909090
--- Additional Comments From tg at mirbsd dot de 2010-01-01 14:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=4488)
-- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4488action=view)
New minimal testcase
New more minimal testcase. I used an external function to make sure
gcc doesnt optimise
11 matches
Mail list logo