[Bug binutils/28435] ar --record--libdeps: ar l vs ar L

2021-10-23 Thread tg at mirbsd dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28435 Thorsten Glaser changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tg at mirbsd dot de --- Comment #1

[Bug binutils/28435] ar --record--libdeps: ar l vs ar L

2021-10-23 Thread tg at mirbsd dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28435 --- Comment #2 from Thorsten Glaser --- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943274 as well… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/12180] gas: -mfido doesn't accept floating point instructions

2010-11-04 Thread tg at mirbsd dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12180 --- Comment #12 from Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot de 2010-11-04 09:39:41 UTC --- No, I didn’t do anything special to build, I just ran dpkg-buildpackage, and it does a three-stage bootstrap then uses the stage3 compiler to build the RTL

[Bug gas/12180] gas: -mfido doesn't accept floating point instructions

2010-11-02 Thread tg at mirbsd dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12180 Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat

[Bug gas/12157] New: m68k statement ignored syntax error when @TLSLDO+4(%a0)

2010-10-24 Thread tg at mirbsd dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12157 Summary: m68k statement ignored syntax error when @TLSLDO+4(%a0) Product: binutils Version: 2.20 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component:

[Bug gas/12157] m68k statement ignored syntax error when @TLSLDO+4(%a0)

2010-10-24 Thread tg at mirbsd dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12157 Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Target||m68k-linux-gnu

[Bug ld/10144] mips/ld: non-dynamic relocations refer to dynamic symbol

2010-01-24 Thread tg at mirbsd dot de
-- What|Removed |Added CC||tg at mirbsd dot de http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10144 --- You are receiving this mail

[Bug ld/10144] mips/ld: non-dynamic relocations refer to dynamic symbol

2010-01-23 Thread tg at mirbsd dot de
-- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10144 --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug ld/10144] mips/ld: non-dynamic relocations refer to dynamic symbol

2010-01-23 Thread tg at mirbsd dot de
--- Additional Comments From tg at mirbsd dot de 2010-01-23 18:03 --- Created an attachment (id=4550) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4550action=view) Testcase #3 (with .c .s .o/.so) (In reply to comment #4) Works for me with FSF versions of GCC and binutils

[Bug gas/10740] Intel syntax far jumps broken

2010-01-03 Thread tg at mirbsd dot de
--- Additional Comments From tg at mirbsd dot de 2010-01-03 16:44 --- I think there may be a documentation or bug issue left: You are testing for: ljmp0x9090,0x90909090 ljmp0x9090:0x90909090 jmp 0x9090,0x90909090 jmp 0x9090:0x90909090

[Bug ld/10144] mips/ld: non-dynamic relocations refer to dynamic symbol

2010-01-01 Thread tg at mirbsd dot de
--- Additional Comments From tg at mirbsd dot de 2010-01-01 14:37 --- Created an attachment (id=4488) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4488action=view) New minimal testcase New more minimal testcase. I used an external function to make sure gcc doesn’t optimise