[Bug binutils/16177] R_ARM_COPY reloc generated for reference in writable section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug binutils/16177] R_ARM_COPY reloc generated for reference in writable section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177 --- Comment #16 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #15) Hi Richard, > It also seems to cause Is there any chance that you could create a reproducer that does not need a compiler or the standard libraries ? I do

[Bug binutils/16177] R_ARM_COPY reloc generated for reference in writable section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug binutils/16177] R_ARM_COPY reloc generated for reference in writable section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177 --- Comment #14 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Dirk Mueller from comment #13) > Updated patch with the changes necessary to build against binutils 2.39 The patch still suffers from the problem triggered by the example in comment #12. --

[Bug binutils/16177] R_ARM_COPY reloc generated for reference in writable section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177 Dirk Mueller changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmueller at suse dot com --- Comment

[Bug binutils/16177] R_ARM_COPY reloc generated for reference in writable section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177 Nick Bowler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nbowler at draconx dot ca -- You are

[Bug binutils/16177] R_ARM_COPY reloc generated for reference in writable section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177 --- Comment #12 from Joe Hermaszewski --- A much more simple reproducer for the error message I mentioned (from GHC's configure script): cat >actest.s <<-EOF .globl _start .p2align 4 _start: bkpt .data .globl data_object

[Bug binutils/16177] R_ARM_COPY reloc generated for reference in writable section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177 --- Comment #11 from Joe Hermaszewski --- To reproduce, - Get a copy of the ncurses 6.2 source - With binutils (with the patch), and gcc in PATH (both cross compiling to armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf) -

[Bug binutils/16177] R_ARM_COPY reloc generated for reference in writable section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177 Joe Hermaszewski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sourceware at sub dot monoid.al

[Bug binutils/16177] R_ARM_COPY reloc generated for reference in writable section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177 James Clarke changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jrtc27 at jrtc27 dot com --- Comment

[Bug binutils/16177] R_ARM_COPY reloc generated for reference in writable section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177 Michael Truog changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mjtruog at gmail dot com -- You are

[Bug binutils/16177] R_ARM_COPY reloc generated for reference in writable section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177 --- Comment #8 from John Ericson --- I just copied it, but think I'll be able to confirm that for you by end of next week. Thanks, John -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/16177] R_ARM_COPY reloc generated for reference in writable section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177 --- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton --- The question is - does the patch work ? I am happy to apply it, provided that it can be confirmed that it works in a real ARM-based system. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug binutils/16177] R_ARM_COPY reloc generated for reference in writable section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177 John Ericson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||John.Ericson at Obsidian dot Syste

[Bug binutils/16177] R_ARM_COPY reloc generated for reference in writable section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177 --- Comment #5 from Ben Gamari --- My new hardware arrived. Naturally the patch required a bit of rebasing. My guess can be found here, https://github.com/bgamari/binutils-gdb/commit/539f59256dd8b503b1188eecb30a338ee38616f8. I've started a

[Bug binutils/16177] R_ARM_COPY reloc generated for reference in writable section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177 Sergei Trofimovich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||slyfox at inbox dot ru -- You

[Bug binutils/16177] R_ARM_COPY reloc generated for reference in writable section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177 --- Comment #4 from Ben Gamari --- Unfortunately my ARM hardware bit the dust. I'm waiting to take shipment of a new board and will test when it arrives. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/16177] R_ARM_COPY reloc generated for reference in writable section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Nick

[Bug binutils/16177] R_ARM_COPY reloc generated for reference in writable section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment

[Bug binutils/16177] R_ARM_COPY reloc generated for reference in writable section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177 Ben Gamari bgamari at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bgamari at gmail

[Bug binutils/16177] R_ARM_COPY reloc generated for reference in writable section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177 --- Comment #1 from Ben Gamari bgamari at gmail dot com --- This appears to be responsible for brokenness on ARM when the Glasgow Haskell Compiler is used to produce dynamically linked executables