--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-31
02:05 ---
I have examined the problem more extensively. The problem exists up to Texinfo
version 4.3 (and point releases of 4.3). Texinfo 4.4 adds the necessary support
for @include @value and is now the minimum
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-31
02:18 ---
A patch is posted at:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-03/msg00364.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
GCC target triplet|hppa64-linuxinux|hppa64-linux
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1860
--- You are receiving this mail
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-12-22 18:26 ---
Subject: Re: binutils.texi:3495: No such file or directory.
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-12-22 17:08
---
It works for me.
This was caused by using an old
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2005-12-23 03:30
---
Reopening; still not fixed.
Needs a makeinfo = 4.2 4.5 (?) to repeat the behavior.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-11-12 20:45 ---
Subject: Re: binutils.texi:3495: No such file or directory.
Doesn't happen when not doing a cross.
Don't know why *that* case is different, but for the
Different PATHs caused different
