[Bug binutils/21136] readelf segfault - heap buffer overflow

2017-02-13 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21136 --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton --- > Sorry - that was my mistake. I should have ibndi [Doh - hit send before I was ready]. What I meant to say was that you were correct. This bug is essentially a duplicate of 21139 not 21137. I have

[Bug binutils/21136] readelf segfault - heap buffer overflow

2017-02-13 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21136 --- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Thuan, > Thank you for quickly fixing the bugs I reported. 21136 looks totally > different from 21137, both in call-stack and in crashing functions. I do > see that 21136 shares something in common

[Bug binutils/21136] readelf segfault - heap buffer overflow

2017-02-13 Thread thuanpv at comp dot nus.edu.sg
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21136 --- Comment #3 from Thuan Pham --- Hi Nick, Thank you for quickly fixing the bugs I reported. 21136 looks totally different from 21137, both in call-stack and in crashing functions. I do see that 21136 shares something in common with 21139;

[Bug binutils/21136] readelf segfault - heap buffer overflow

2017-02-13 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21136 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/21136] readelf segfault - heap buffer overflow

2017-02-13 Thread thuanpv at comp dot nus.edu.sg
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21136 --- Comment #1 from Thuan Pham --- binutils was built with ASAN using gcc-6.2 and clang-3.4. The configure command was: CC=clang CFLAGS="-DFORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector-all -fsanitize=undefined,address -fno-omit-frame-pointer -g