[Bug binutils/22911] Huge slowdown in objdump -d caused by scanning the dynamic relocs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22911 Jeremi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jeremip11 at gmail dot com -- You are

[Bug binutils/22911] Huge slowdown in objdump -d caused by scanning the dynamic relocs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22911 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manjian2006 at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug binutils/22911] Huge slowdown in objdump -d caused by scanning the dynamic relocs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22911 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/22911] Huge slowdown in objdump -d caused by scanning the dynamic relocs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22911 --- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=0e70b27ba900581df8e23cbbd4612176f869d796 commit

[Bug binutils/22911] Huge slowdown in objdump -d caused by scanning the dynamic relocs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22911 --- Comment #7 from Mark Wielaard --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6) > A patch is posted at > > https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-03/msg00015.html Thanks. With that patch my original testcase takes just 11 seconds (from 2

[Bug binutils/22911] Huge slowdown in objdump -d caused by scanning the dynamic relocs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22911 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- A patch is posted at https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-03/msg00015.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

[Bug binutils/22911] Huge slowdown in objdump -d caused by scanning the dynamic relocs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22911 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug binutils/22911] Huge slowdown in objdump -d caused by scanning the dynamic relocs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22911 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.31 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---

[Bug binutils/22911] Huge slowdown in objdump -d caused by scanning the dynamic relocs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22911 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #2) > It might depend on the testfile used. The libxul.so that I used for testing > is the one packaged with RHEL 7.4. But others have replicated with the Confirmed

[Bug binutils/22911] Huge slowdown in objdump -d caused by scanning the dynamic relocs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22911 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |2.31 (HEAD) -- You are receiving this

[Bug binutils/22911] Huge slowdown in objdump -d caused by scanning the dynamic relocs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22911 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #2 from Mark

[Bug binutils/22911] Huge slowdown in objdump -d caused by scanning the dynamic relocs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22911 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---